On segunda-feira, 7 de janeiro de 2013 13.04.50, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:23:21AM -0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On sexta-feira, 4 de janeiro de 2013 09.38.31, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > > > I know how to make a relocatable shared library on Linux (find the
> > > > cal
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:23:21AM -0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sexta-feira, 4 de janeiro de 2013 09.38.31, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > > I know how to make a relocatable shared library on Linux (find the calling
> > > function's address in /proc/self/maps) and I know it's possible with some
> >
On 04/01/2013 12:48, Kalinowski Maurice wrote:
>> Still don't get it: when PATH is the only way to tell the app
>> which Qt dlls to load, why do we need to patch the dlls?
>> Or is PATH changed by app.exe before it loads the Qt dlls and has the
>> paths compiled in?
>
> Eg. Plugins. The plugin pat
On sexta-feira, 4 de janeiro de 2013 12.45.12, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> Then
> >> qt.conf in the same dir as QtCore/qmake should be enough on Windows, or
> >> missed I something?
> >
> > You missed something. The question is: when running app.exe from a given
> > directory, how do you tell Windows
.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Non-movable Qt build
>
> On 04.01.2013 12:27, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On sexta-feira, 4 de janeiro de 2013 09.35.33, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> Isn't on Windows only PATH used to figure out which Dll to load?
> >
> > Correct.
On 04.01.2013 12:27, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sexta-feira, 4 de janeiro de 2013 09.35.33, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Isn't on Windows only PATH used to figure out which Dll to load?
>
> Correct.
>
>> Then
>> qt.conf in the same dir as QtCore/qmake should be enough on Windows, or
>> missed I somethin
On sexta-feira, 4 de janeiro de 2013 09.35.33, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Isn't on Windows only PATH used to figure out which Dll to load?
Correct.
> Then
> qt.conf in the same dir as QtCore/qmake should be enough on Windows, or
> missed I something?
You missed something. The question is: when runnin
On sexta-feira, 4 de janeiro de 2013 09.38.31, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > I know how to make a relocatable shared library on Linux (find the calling
> > function's address in /proc/self/maps) and I know it's possible with some
> > Win32 API, but I have no clue how to do it elsewhere. Therefore, I won'
On 02.01.2013 14:18, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 14.01.02, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> On 02.01.2013 13:50, Yves Bailly wrote:
>>> Le 02/01/2013 13:42, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
> Does anyone k
On 02.01.2013 14:33, Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
> On 2/01/13 11:01 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> On 02.01.2013 13:50, Yves Bailly wrote:
>>> Le 02/01/2013 13:42, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
> Does anyone knows where I could find the
On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 23.33.57, Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
> Qtopia had a simple perl script to patch QtCore. It's old but should
> give you an idea of how easy it is to do the patching of QtCore/qmake.
> The SDK patching just requires replacing strings in text files.
Yeah, those scri
On 2/01/13 11:01 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> On 02.01.2013 13:50, Yves Bailly wrote:
>> Le 02/01/2013 13:42, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
>>> On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
Does anyone knows where I could find the source code of the "official"
installer, or
On 01/02/2013 02:09 PM, Yves Bailly wrote:
> Le 02/01/2013 13:50, Sergio Ahumada a écrit :
>> On 01/02/2013 01:50 PM, Yves Bailly wrote:
>>> Le 02/01/2013 13:42, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
> Does anyone knows where I could f
On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 13.50.16, Yves Bailly wrote:
> Le 02/01/2013 13:42, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> > On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
> >> Does anyone knows where I could find the source code of the "official"
> >> installer, or at least some inf
On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 14.01.02, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> On 02.01.2013 13:50, Yves Bailly wrote:
> > Le 02/01/2013 13:42, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> >> On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
> >>> Does anyone knows where I could find the source code of the
Le 02/01/2013 13:50, Sergio Ahumada a écrit :
> On 01/02/2013 01:50 PM, Yves Bailly wrote:
>> Le 02/01/2013 13:42, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
>>> On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
Does anyone knows where I could find the source code of the "official"
instal
On 02.01.2013 13:50, Yves Bailly wrote:
> Le 02/01/2013 13:42, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
>> On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
>>> Does anyone knows where I could find the source code of the "official"
>>> installer, or at least some information about what it does? B
>
> On 01/02/2013 01:50 PM, Yves Bailly wrote:
> > Le 02/01/2013 13:42, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> >> On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
> >>> Does anyone knows where I could find the source code of the "official"
> >>> installer, or at least some information about
On 01/02/2013 01:50 PM, Yves Bailly wrote:
> Le 02/01/2013 13:42, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
>> On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
>>> Does anyone knows where I could find the source code of the "official"
>>> installer, or at least some information about what it does
Le 02/01/2013 13:42, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
>> Does anyone knows where I could find the source code of the "official"
>> installer, or at least some information about what it does? Because the
>> installer does relocate the bin
Op 2-1-2013 13:42, Thiago Macieira schreef:
> On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
>> Does anyone knows where I could find the source code of the "official"
>> installer, or at least some information about what it does? Because the
>> installer does relocate the binari
On quarta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2013 10.53.03, Yves Bailly wrote:
> Does anyone knows where I could find the source code of the "official"
> installer, or at least some information about what it does? Because the
> installer does relocate the binaries, that would be a good starting point
> to relo
Le 28/12/2012 13:15, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> On sexta-feira, 28 de dezembro de 2012 12.39.40, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 16:14:10 Yves Bailly wrote:
>>> Any hint greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Why can you not use 'make install'?
>
> He can do make install, but most peop
On sexta-feira, 28 de dezembro de 2012 12.39.40, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 16:14:10 Yves Bailly wrote:
> > Any hint greatly appreciated.
>
> Why can you not use 'make install'?
He can do make install, but most people developing on Windows don't because
their prefix i
On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 16:14:10 Yves Bailly wrote:
> Any hint greatly appreciated.
Why can you not use 'make install'?
Thanks,
--
Stephen Kelly | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540
Le 26/12/2012 19:10, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> On quarta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2012 16.55.12, Yves Bailly wrote:
>> Le 26/12/2012 16:39, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
>>> On quarta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2012 16.14.10, Yves Bailly wrote:
Why not use relative paths, e.g.
QT_MODULE_BIN_B
On quarta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2012 16.55.12, Yves Bailly wrote:
> Le 26/12/2012 16:39, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> > On quarta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2012 16.14.10, Yves Bailly wrote:
> >> Why not use relative paths, e.g.
> >> QT_MODULE_BIN_BASE = ../../qtbase/bin
> >> ...or some variable, e
Le 26/12/2012 16:39, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> On quarta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2012 16.14.10, Yves Bailly wrote:
>> Why not use relative paths, e.g.
>> QT_MODULE_BIN_BASE = ../../qtbase/bin
>> ...or some variable, e.g.
>> QT_MODULE_BIN_BASE = ${QTDIR}/qtbase/bin
>>
>> ??
>>
>> Any hint greatly
On quarta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2012 16.14.10, Yves Bailly wrote:
> Why not use relative paths, e.g.
> QT_MODULE_BIN_BASE = ../../qtbase/bin
> ...or some variable, e.g.
> QT_MODULE_BIN_BASE = ${QTDIR}/qtbase/bin
>
> ??
>
> Any hint greatly appreciated.
Create a file called qt.conf in the bin
Greetings all,
(cross-posting to both "devel" and "interest" as I think this may be relevent
to both)
I've build a 32bits Qt5 from the big ZIP archive using Visual C++ 2010 on a
Win7 64bits host.
Let's say the Qt5 sources where in D:\srcs\qt5-win32 - that's where I build the
binaries.
Everyt
30 matches
Mail list logo
