Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Koehne Kai wrote: > We only do patch level releases for Qt 4.8.x, and you usually don't change > reference configurations in patch level releases. That's also why we e.g. > still released Qt 4.8.5 with a completely outdated MinGW 4.4, which is > actually quite har

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Charley Bay wrote: > Tony sayeth: > , > > We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new > platforms coming in and old ones are just that.old. > > , > > These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and t

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-11 Thread Charley Bay
> > Tony sayeth: >>> , We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms coming in and old ones are just that.old. >>> >>> , These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and the current proposition can be seen here: http://

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-11 Thread qtnext
for X64, msvc2012 is fine, but it seems that for XP 32, msvc 2012 is not possible If I have correctly understand. 2013/8/11 Laszlo Papp > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Charley Bay wrote: > >> Tony sayeth: >> >>> , >>> >>> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new p

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Charley Bay wrote: > Tony sayeth: > >> , >> >> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms >> coming in and old ones are just that.old. >> > > >> , >> >> These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and the current proposition >> can be

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-10 Thread Charley Bay
Tony sayeth: > , > We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms > coming in and old ones are just that.old. > > , > These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and the current proposition can > be seen here: > > http://qt-project.org/wiki/CI_Configurations > > (That we

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 19:25:33, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Thiago Macieira > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/+Linux/posts/JCA6uZYiXzg > > I do not see 3.2 declared non-LTS, in there, but I see it declared so on > the official site. Ok, then I change my reque

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 18:45:16, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Thiago Macieira > > > > wrote: > > > On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 17:05:51, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > > > > Also, please ensure that w

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 18:45:16, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Thiago Macieira > > wrote: > > On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 17:05:51, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > > > Also, please ensure that we have one of the LTS kernels (3.0, 3.4 or > > > > 3.10). > > > >

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 17:05:51, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > > Also, please ensure that we have one of the LTS kernels (3.0, 3.4 or > > > 3.10). > > > > We have had Ubuntu 12.04 LTS for a while using LTS kernel (3.2). > > That's an

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 17:05:51, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > Also, please ensure that we have one of the LTS kernels (3.0, 3.4 or > > 3.10). > > We have had Ubuntu 12.04 LTS for a while using LTS kernel (3.2). That's an unofficial LTS. I'm requesting, if possible, that we use an official

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Tony, would there be any OS X 10.6 machines left in the CI? If not, then I > think this is a bad idea. Like Jake says, 35% of the market still uses > 10.6, > we need Qt tested there. Apple accelerated the last two releases of their > OS > an

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 09:47:18, Sarajärvi Tony wrote: > As Ubuntu 10.04 is using KDE and not Gnome, I'd like to know what you think > if we used KDE in Ubuntu 13.04 as well? I'd rather we sticked to KDE. At the very least, kwin. It's a WM we know, behaves properly, and whose mainta

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 13:12:29, Sergio Ahumada wrote: > > Changes in short would be to drop OSX 10.6 and Ubuntu 10.04 from our > > builds. As new platforms we would bring up OSX 10.9 and Ubuntu 13.04. > > Also a new platform would be Windows 8.1, which would get one or two > > config

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Jake Thomas Petroules
On Aug 7, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Sergio Ahumada wrote: > On 08/07/2013 11:47 AM, Sarajärvi Tony wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms >> coming in and old ones are just that.old. >> >> Changes in short would be to drop OSX 10.6 and Ubuntu 1

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread deDietrich Gabriel
Hi, On 07 Aug 2013, at 11:47, Sarajärvi Tony mailto:tony.saraja...@digia.com>> wrote: Changes in short would be to drop OSX 10.6 and Ubuntu 10.04 from our builds. As new platforms we would bring up OSX 10.9 and Ubuntu 13.04. +1 for the OS X part. These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and