On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Koehne Kai wrote:
> We only do patch level releases for Qt 4.8.x, and you usually don't change
> reference configurations in patch level releases. That's also why we e.g.
> still released Qt 4.8.5 with a completely outdated MinGW 4.4, which is
> actually quite har
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Charley Bay wrote:
> Tony sayeth:
> ,
>
> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new
> platforms coming in and old ones are just that.old.
>
> ,
>
> These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and t
>
> Tony sayeth:
>>>
,
We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new
platforms coming in and old ones are just that.old.
>>>
>>>
,
These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and the current proposition
can be seen here:
http://
for X64, msvc2012 is fine, but it seems that for XP 32, msvc 2012 is not
possible If I have correctly understand.
2013/8/11 Laszlo Papp
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Charley Bay wrote:
>
>> Tony sayeth:
>>
>>> ,
>>>
>>> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new p
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Charley Bay wrote:
> Tony sayeth:
>
>> ,
>>
>> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms
>> coming in and old ones are just that.old.
>>
>
>
>> ,
>>
>> These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and the current proposition
>> can be
Tony sayeth:
> ,
> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms
> coming in and old ones are just that.old.
>
> ,
> These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and the current proposition can
> be seen here:
>
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/CI_Configurations
>
> (That we
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 19:25:33, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Thiago Macieira
> > https://plus.google.com/u/0/+Linux/posts/JCA6uZYiXzg
>
> I do not see 3.2 declared non-LTS, in there, but I see it declared so on
> the official site.
Ok, then I change my reque
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 18:45:16, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Thiago Macieira
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 17:05:51, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > > > > Also, please ensure that w
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 18:45:16, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Thiago Macieira
>
> wrote:
> > On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 17:05:51, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > > > Also, please ensure that we have one of the LTS kernels (3.0, 3.4 or
> > > > 3.10).
> > >
>
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 17:05:51, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > > Also, please ensure that we have one of the LTS kernels (3.0, 3.4 or
> > > 3.10).
> >
> > We have had Ubuntu 12.04 LTS for a while using LTS kernel (3.2).
>
> That's an
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 17:05:51, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > Also, please ensure that we have one of the LTS kernels (3.0, 3.4 or
> > 3.10).
>
> We have had Ubuntu 12.04 LTS for a while using LTS kernel (3.2).
That's an unofficial LTS. I'm requesting, if possible, that we use an official
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> Tony, would there be any OS X 10.6 machines left in the CI? If not, then I
> think this is a bad idea. Like Jake says, 35% of the market still uses
> 10.6,
> we need Qt tested there. Apple accelerated the last two releases of their
> OS
> an
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 09:47:18, Sarajärvi Tony wrote:
> As Ubuntu 10.04 is using KDE and not Gnome, I'd like to know what you think
> if we used KDE in Ubuntu 13.04 as well?
I'd rather we sticked to KDE. At the very least, kwin. It's a WM we know,
behaves properly, and whose mainta
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 13:12:29, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> > Changes in short would be to drop OSX 10.6 and Ubuntu 10.04 from our
> > builds. As new platforms we would bring up OSX 10.9 and Ubuntu 13.04.
> > Also a new platform would be Windows 8.1, which would get one or two
> > config
On Aug 7, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> On 08/07/2013 11:47 AM, Sarajärvi Tony wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms
>> coming in and old ones are just that.old.
>>
>> Changes in short would be to drop OSX 10.6 and Ubuntu 1
Hi,
On 07 Aug 2013, at 11:47, Sarajärvi Tony
mailto:tony.saraja...@digia.com>> wrote:
Changes in short would be to drop OSX 10.6 and Ubuntu 10.04 from our builds. As
new platforms we would bring up OSX 10.9 and Ubuntu 13.04.
+1 for the OS X part.
These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and
16 matches
Mail list logo