Varelius, Jouni Lintunen
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B
--
Von: Development im Auftrag von Robert
Löhning
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2020 21:15
An: development@qt-project.org
Betreff: Re: [D
Am 26.08.20 um 09:18 schrieb Lars Knoll:
> (...)
> This is the one place where we rely on a non standard (but supported by all
> our compilers) feature. Namely the ability to call offsetof() on non-standard
> types.
Hi Lars,
how will undefined behavior sanitizers (UBSAN) react to this?
Cheers,
> On 1 Sep 2020, at 16:12, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 02:54:49 PDT Lars Knoll wrote:
>>> If it's only for compatibility, what should one write in the Q_PROPERTY
>>> header for new properties?
>>
>> As said, it’s for both old and new properties in QObjects. What you n
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 02:54:49 PDT Lars Knoll wrote:
> > If it's only for compatibility, what should one write in the Q_PROPERTY
> > header for new properties?
>
> As said, it’s for both old and new properties in QObjects. What you need to
> do to convert a property and make it bindable is
> On 31 Aug 2020, at 06:17, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 26 August 2020 00:18:49 PDT Lars Knoll wrote:
>> To summarise the advantages of the redesigned system:
>>
>> * Very little memory overhead if bindings aren’t used
>> * Very low runtime overhead if bindings aren’t used
>> * Bind
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 09:20, Lars Knoll wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After the long discussions a few weeks back about the new property system and
> some trial to port the existing properties over to the new system, it became
> somewhat clear to me that the approach we had tried so far won’t work and
On Wednesday, 26 August 2020 00:18:49 PDT Lars Knoll wrote:
> To summarise the advantages of the redesigned system:
>
> * Very little memory overhead if bindings aren’t used
> * Very low runtime overhead if bindings aren’t used
> * Binding support can be added to properties in QObjects in a binary
Hi all,
After the long discussions a few weeks back about the new property system and
some trial to port the existing properties over to the new system, it became
somewhat clear to me that the approach we had tried so far won’t work and be
ready in time for the feature freeze.
The main problem
