On 10/13/2015 12:01 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:53:21AM +, Hausmann Simon wrote:
>> I think code that isn't specific to the automotive industry such as as
>> the dbus integration should be integrated into existing modules unless
>> there is a good reason otherwi
=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On
Behalf Of Viironen Kalle
Sent: tiistaina 13. lokakuuta 2015 10.35
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] New Qt Modules
Hi,
We’d like to have a bunch of new modules under qt-project. These are all needed
in Qt Automotive Suite so let’s try to get
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 18:01:31 Dominik Holland wrote:
>> Am 13.10.15 um 16:15 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
>> > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 07:35:14 Viironen Kalle wrote:
>> >> * qt/qtapplicationmanager, Qt component for application lifec
On Tuesday 13 October 2015 18:01:31 Dominik Holland wrote:
> Am 13.10.15 um 16:15 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 07:35:14 Viironen Kalle wrote:
> >> * qt/qtapplicationmanager, Qt component for application lifecycle
> >
> > management
> >
> >> * qt/qtivi, Qt IVI exte
Am 13.10.15 um 16:15 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 07:35:14 Viironen Kalle wrote:
>> * qt/qtapplicationmanager, Qt component for application lifecycle
> management
>> * qt/qtivi, Qt IVI extensible platform abstraction layer
>
> I'd like more information on what's o
Am 13.10.15 um 16:09 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 09:52:54 Knoll Lars wrote:
>> The only one I could see that could make sense in an existing repo is the
>> dbus qml integration, but then again, this one can’t live in qtbase where
>> the rest of the dbus code lives. So it’
On Tuesday 13 October 2015 07:35:14 Viironen Kalle wrote:
> * qt/qtapplicationmanager, Qt component for application lifecycle
management
> * qt/qtivi, Qt IVI extensible platform abstraction layer
I'd like more information on what's on these. What's application lifecycle
management? Is that
On Tuesday 13 October 2015 09:52:54 Knoll Lars wrote:
> The only one I could see that could make sense in an existing repo is the
> dbus qml integration, but then again, this one can’t live in qtbase where
> the rest of the dbus code lives. So it’s either a separate repo, or we add
> it to the qtde
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:07:00PM +0200, Dominik Holland wrote:
> qtdbusqml was written some time ago. Although it still works it has a
> lot of rough edges and i think it should go into the playground first.
>
that's still qt/qtdbusqml as far as repos are concerned.
or qt/qtdeclarative//wip/dbu
Simon
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Viironen Kalle
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 09:35
>> To: development@qt-project.org
>> Subject: [Development] New Qt Modules
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> We’d like to have a bunch of new
Op 13-10-2015 om 12:22 schreef Oswald Buddenhagen:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:52:54AM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
>> The only one I could see that could make sense in an existing repo is the
>> dbus qml integration, but then again, this one can’t live in qtbase where
>> the rest of the dbus code liv
On 13/10/15 12:22, "Oswald Buddenhagen"
wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:52:54AM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
>> The only one I could see that could make sense in an existing repo is
>>the
>> dbus qml integration, but then again, this one can’t live in qtbase
>>where
>> the rest of the dbus code li
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:52:54AM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
> The only one I could see that could make sense in an existing repo is the
> dbus qml integration, but then again, this one can’t live in qtbase where
> the rest of the dbus code lives. So it’s either a separate repo, or we add
> it to th
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:53:21AM +, Hausmann Simon wrote:
> I think code that isn't specific to the automotive industry such as as
> the dbus integration should be integrated into existing modules unless
> there is a good reason otherwise.
>
i said the same. ^^
it turns out that there are, e
,
>Simon
>
>
>
>From: Viironen Kalle
>Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 09:35
>To: development@qt-project.org
>Subject: [Development] New Qt Modules
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>
>We’d like to have a bunch of new modules under qt-project. These are all
>needed in Qt Automo
t.org
Subject: [Development] New Qt Modules
Hi,
We'd like to have a bunch of new modules under qt-project. These are all needed
in Qt Automotive Suite so let's try to get this sorted out quickly to get
things rolling nicely.
New repositories needed are:
*
qt/qtapplicationmanager, Q
+1
--
Tuukka
From: development-bounces+tuukka.turunen=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+tuukka.turunen=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On
Behalf Of Viironen Kalle
Sent: tiistaina 13. lokakuuta 2015 10.35
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] New Qt
Hi,
We’d like to have a bunch of new modules under qt-project. These are all needed
in Qt Automotive Suite so let’s try to get this sorted out quickly to get
things rolling nicely.
New repositories needed are:
*
qt/qtapplicationmanager, Qt component for application lifecycle management
*
18 matches
Mail list logo
