On 11/30/11 10:59 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira"
wrote:
>On Thursday, 1 de December de 2011 02.39.23, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> Yes, I understand the need to have the tools compiled for the host
>> architecture when cross compiling, but I don't understand why that was
>> brought up in the context of mo
On Thursday, 1 de December de 2011 02.39.23, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Yes, I understand the need to have the tools compiled for the host
> architecture when cross compiling, but I don't understand why that was
> brought up in the context of moving the source code for the tools to a
> different repo.
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 01:58:31 you wrote:
> On Thursday 01 December 2011 01:16:53 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:01:32 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 30 de November de 2011 19.01.53, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > > For now I'm interested in floa
On Thursday 01 December 2011 01:16:53 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:01:32 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 30 de November de 2011 19.01.53, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > For now I'm interested in floating the general idea of putting
> > > > build-time- tools
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:01:32 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 de November de 2011 19.01.53, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > For now I'm interested in floating the general idea of putting
> > > build-time- tools into qtbase.git instead of qttools.git.
> >
> > Sounds reasonable
On Wednesday, 30 de November de 2011 21.04.11, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> i don't want that. lrelease is bootstrapped since 4.6 or so, and it
> sucks (no codec support, for example). also, the code sharing between
> the linguist app and tools would add some logistical hassle when tearing
> apart t
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:20:27PM +0100, ext Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > If I want to use the QtDBus module, I want to be able to use the tools to
> > generate xml and c++ interfaces for dbus.
>
> that's reasonable.
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:20:27PM +0100, ext Stephen Kelly wrote:
> If I want to use the QtDBus module, I want to be able to use the tools to
> generate xml and c++ interfaces for dbus.
>
that's reasonable.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:01:32AM -0800, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I don't know, ho
On Wednesday, 30 de November de 2011 19.01.53, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > For now I'm interested in floating the general idea of putting build-time-
> > tools into qtbase.git instead of qttools.git.
>
> Sounds reasonable IMO.
Agreed.
HarryF has done some work for the Fremantle port of Qt to ma
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently lupdate, lrelease, qdbusxml2cpp and qdbuscpp2xml are not in the
> qtbase repo, they are in qttools instead, along with designer, qdbusviewer,
> linguist etc.
>
> I don't think qttools is the right place for those build-time-u
Hi,
Currently lupdate, lrelease, qdbusxml2cpp and qdbuscpp2xml are not in the
qtbase repo, they are in qttools instead, along with designer, qdbusviewer,
linguist etc.
I don't think qttools is the right place for those build-time-useful tools.
If I want to use the QtDBus module, I want to be
11 matches
Mail list logo
