Hi,
On Monday 15 October 2012 14:21:18 Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance; before reading this I thought that QtMobility had been
> merged into Qt 5 as add-on modules. May I ask why functionality is still
> being kept duplicated?
Right, all of qtmobility has been split up for Qt5, as diffe
On 10/15/2012 10:21 PM, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
Pardon my ignorance; before reading this I thought that QtMobility had
been merged into Qt 5 as add-on modules. May I ask why functionality
is still being kept duplicated?
So did I, as well as QtMultimediaKit now being renamed to QtMultimedia
and ma
Pardon my ignorance; before reading this I thought that QtMobility had been
merged into Qt 5 as add-on modules. May I ask why functionality is still
being kept duplicated?
Sze-Howe
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> I agree as well. I'll check if there's any legal issues in m
I agree as well. I'll check if there's any legal issues in moving the code to
the project, and then try to get it done as soon as possible.
Cheers,
Lars
On Oct 15, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Angel Perles wrote:
> +1 for this.
>
> Everyone is solving their own problems with QtMobility and if is
> bec
+1 for this.
Everyone is solving their own problems with QtMobility and if is
becoming fragmented.
Regards,
Àngel
El 15/10/12 10:24, Thomas McGuire escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose to move QtMobility to the qt-project.org.
>
> The main reason I am proposing this is that we (RIM + KDAB) r
Hi,
I'd like to propose to move QtMobility to the qt-project.org.
The main reason I am proposing this is that we (RIM + KDAB) right now have a
fork of QtMobility living on Gitorious [1]. This fork contains backends for
sensors and multimedia for the new BB10 mobile OS, and will likely gain
sup
