On Tuesday 24 July 2012 17:15:37 Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:31 AM, wrote:
> > How about a third solution, that only exposes the three methods that are
> > being used by QTestLib? We could turn QWSI into a namespace, and forward
> > declare the required methods in qtes
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:31 AM, wrote:
>
>
> On 7/19/12 4:45 PM, "ext Girish Ramakrishnan"
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:16 AM, wrote:
>>> On 7/16/12 12:43 PM, "ext Stephen Kelly" wrote:
>>>
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 14:24:18 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10
On 7/19/12 4:45 PM, "ext Girish Ramakrishnan"
wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:16 AM, wrote:
>> On 7/16/12 12:43 PM, "ext Stephen Kelly" wrote:
>>
>>>On Sunday, July 15, 2012 14:24:18 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:53:33AM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:16 AM, wrote:
> On 7/16/12 12:43 PM, "ext Stephen Kelly" wrote:
>
>>On Sunday, July 15, 2012 14:24:18 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:53:33AM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> > We have only two choices:
>>> >
>>> > 1) make QWindowSystem
On 7/16/12 12:43 PM, "ext Stephen Kelly" wrote:
>On Sunday, July 15, 2012 14:24:18 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:53:33AM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> > We have only two choices:
>> >
>> > 1) make QWindowSystemInterface a proper, public API class
>>
>> I thi
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 14:24:18 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:53:33AM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > We have only two choices:
> >
> > 1) make QWindowSystemInterface a proper, public API class
>
> I think QWindowSystemInterface in its current form would be
>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:53:33AM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> We have only two choices:
>
> 1) make QWindowSystemInterface a proper, public API class
I think QWindowSystemInterface in its current form would be
a rather incomplete and limited API. Many months ago I looked into
creating a p
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 20:00:39 you wrote:
>> An alternate approach is to make a header specific to QTestLib which
>> ensures that modules privates are not required.
>
> This is very hacky. I prefer to simply move it from qp
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 20:00:39 you wrote:
> An alternate approach is to make a header specific to QTestLib which
> ensures that modules privates are not required.
This is very hacky. I prefer to simply move it from qpa/ to the same location
as the rest of the public headers.
However, a s
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 16:54:57 Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Thiago Macieira
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On terça-feira, 10 de julho de 2012 11.37.41, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> >> If it is not made public, then all C
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 16:54:57 Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Thiago Macieira
>
> wrote:
> > On terça-feira, 10 de julho de 2012 11.37.41, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >> If it is not made public, then all CMake based code using QtTest will
> >> have to use private Qt
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On terça-feira, 10 de julho de 2012 11.37.41, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> If it is not made public, then all CMake based code using QtTest will have
>> to use private QtGui headers.
>
> $ git grep -l QWindowSystemInterface | cat
> qtestkeyboar
On terça-feira, 10 de julho de 2012 11.37.41, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> If it is not made public, then all CMake based code using QtTest will have
> to use private QtGui headers.
$ git grep -l QWindowSystemInterface | cat
qtestkeyboard.h
qtestmouse.h
qtesttouch.h
We have only two choices:
1) make
Hi there,
QWindowSystemInterface is treated as a QPA header since this discussion:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.devel/4178/focus=4210
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.devel/4178/focus=4206
QWindowSystemInterface is different to QPA API because it is just a bunch of
stati
14 matches
Mail list logo
