Em terça-feira, 18 de abril de 2017, às 08:31:06 PDT, André Pönitz escreveu:
> > Getting this upstreamed is going to be difficult because of the concerns
> > Red Hat Legal has about the Qt CLA.
>
> Interesting... real reasons, or company politics?
[guessing] Real in the sense of "some people get
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:19:43PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017 15:05:30 PDT Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Thiago Macieira wrote:
> >> > So src/widgets/styles/qgtkstyle.cpp did not compile with Gtk3?
> >>
> >> No, it doesn't. The GTK+ 3 t
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017 15:05:30 PDT Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> > So src/widgets/styles/qgtkstyle.cpp did not compile with Gtk3?
>>
>> No, it doesn't. The GTK+ 3 theming API is very different.
>>
>> Some Red Hat / Fedora developers have
On segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017 15:05:30 PDT Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > So src/widgets/styles/qgtkstyle.cpp did not compile with Gtk3?
>
> No, it doesn't. The GTK+ 3 theming API is very different.
>
> Some Red Hat / Fedora developers have ported the Adwaita style (the
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> So src/widgets/styles/qgtkstyle.cpp did not compile with Gtk3?
No, it doesn't. The GTK+ 3 theming API is very different.
Some Red Hat / Fedora developers have ported the Adwaita style (the default
GNOME 3 style) to Qt natively, and that is chosen by default on GNOME 3 in
On segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017 11:19:42 PDT Sérgio Martins wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Thiago Macieira
>
> wrote:
> > Looks like we moved important functionality from qtbase to qtstyleplugins.
> > Why wasn't it added to .gitmodules and included in the 5.7.0 and 5.8.0
> > rele
17.04.2017, 21:20, "Sérgio Martins" :
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Thiago Macieira
> wrote:
>> Looks like we moved important functionality from qtbase to qtstyleplugins.
>> Why
>> wasn't it added to .gitmodules and included in the 5.7.0 and 5.8.0 releases?
>
> IIRC, the gtk2 stuff was c
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> Looks like we moved important functionality from qtbase to qtstyleplugins. Why
> wasn't it added to .gitmodules and included in the 5.7.0 and 5.8.0 releases?
IIRC, the gtk2 stuff was considered non-important (there's was a
thread about thi
Looks like we moved important functionality from qtbase to qtstyleplugins. Why
wasn't it added to .gitmodules and included in the 5.7.0 and 5.8.0 releases?
Can we fix it for 5.9.0?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
