On Friday 20. June 2014 06.53.22 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
> On 20 Jun 2014, at 08:32, Knoll Lars wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently Qt WebKit and Qt WebKit Widgets are marked in our documentation
> > as Qt Essentials. I’d like to propose to move them to the add-on category
> > for 5.4.
> >
> > There
On Jun 20, 2014, at 8:53 AM, Rutledge Shawn wrote:
>
> On 20 Jun 2014, at 08:32, Knoll Lars wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently Qt WebKit and Qt WebKit Widgets are marked in our documentation
>> as Qt Essentials. I’d like to propose to move them to the add-on category
>> for 5.4.
>>
>> There ar
On 20/06/14 08:53, "Rutledge Shawn" wrote:
>
>On 20 Jun 2014, at 08:32, Knoll Lars wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently Qt WebKit and Qt WebKit Widgets are marked in our
>>documentation
>> as Qt Essentials. I’d like to propose to move them to the add-on
>>category
>> for 5.4.
>>
>> There are severa
On 20 Jun 2014, at 08:32, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently Qt WebKit and Qt WebKit Widgets are marked in our documentation
> as Qt Essentials. I’d like to propose to move them to the add-on category
> for 5.4.
>
> There are several reasons for that, the main ones being:
>
> * Qt WebKit i
Hi,
Currently Qt WebKit and Qt WebKit Widgets are marked in our documentation
as Qt Essentials. I’d like to propose to move them to the add-on category
for 5.4.
There are several reasons for that, the main ones being:
* Qt WebKit is not supported on Android, iOS and WinRT
* We can’t develop it m