I would often have discussions with Peter and Rich over IRC about complex
QtNetwork issues and I am confident in their ability to work together on
this.
If for organisational reasons it is preferred to have single maintainers,
I'd suggest Rich for the socket/SSL/security parts and Peter for
QNetwor
On 05/11/13 21:58, "André Pönitz"
wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 08:49:45PM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> >> > As some of you may know, Shane has a new job and therefore has a
>>lot
>> >> > less time to spend on QtNetwork. He, Peter and I have discussed how
>> >> > we should maintain the module i
On Monday 04 November 2013 11:55:49 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 4 de novembro de 2013 18:21:38, Knoll Lars wrote:
> > I¹m also happy that Peter and Rich are stepping up to take over the
> > maintainership. A shared maintainership is something we didn¹t have
> > before, but I¹m happy
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 08:49:45PM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote:
> >> > As some of you may know, Shane has a new job and therefore has a lot
> >> > less time to spend on QtNetwork. He, Peter and I have discussed how
> >> > we should maintain the module in the future. What we're proposing is
> >> > that
On 5 Nov 2013, at 8:04 pm, Peter Hartmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I also think having 2 maintainers versus 1 maintainer for QtNetwork will
> not matter much in practice; but if people demand to have one single
> go-to person I am also fine with either of us taking that role.
>
I don't have a pr
Hello,
I also think having 2 maintainers versus 1 maintainer for QtNetwork will
not matter much in practice; but if people demand to have one single
go-to person I am also fine with either of us taking that role.
Peter
On 11/04/2013 09:38 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I think there's
.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
>> > Behalf Of Richard Moore Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 1:32 PM To:
>> > development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Maintainership of
>> > QtNetwork
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > As some of you ma
ounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Richard Moore
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 1:32 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Maintainership of QtNetwork
>
> Hi All,
>
> As some of you may know, Shane has a new job and therefore ha
Hi All,
I think there's a valid question in who gets to be the arbiter should
Peter and I disagree on something, however between Peter, Shane and I
we've been working with pretty much this model anyway - I can't
imagine that any of us would allow something through that one of the
others disagreed
day, November 04, 2013 1:32 PM To:
> > development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Maintainership of
> > QtNetwork
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As some of you may know, Shane has a new job and therefore has a lot
> > less time to spend on QtNetwork. He, Pe
On segunda-feira, 4 de novembro de 2013 18:21:38, Knoll Lars wrote:
> I¹m also happy that Peter and Rich are stepping up to take over the
> maintainership. A shared maintainership is something we didn¹t have
> before, but I¹m happy to try it out. IMO it¹ll work fine, as long as Peter
> and Rich agr
ovember 04, 2013 1:32 PM
>> To: development@qt-project.org
>> Subject: [Development] Maintainership of QtNetwork
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As some of you may know, Shane has a new job and therefore has a lot
>>less
>> time to spend on QtNetwork. He
On 11/04/2013 05:13 PM, Robert Knight wrote:
> Thanks for your work on QtNetwork Shane!
>
Same here, thanks a lot Shane for your work and for your patience getting
QDnsLookup into
shape!
Jeremy
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
ht
Subject: [Development] Maintainership of QtNetwork
>
> Hi All,
>
> As some of you may know, Shane has a new job and therefore has a lot less
> time to spend on QtNetwork. He, Peter and I have discussed how we should
> maintain the module in the future. What we're proposing is that
Thanks for your work on QtNetwork Shane!
On 4 November 2013 12:31, Richard Moore wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As some of you may know, Shane has a new job and therefore has a lot
> less time to spend on QtNetwork. He, Peter and I have discussed how we
> should maintain the module in the future. What we'r
Hi All,
As some of you may know, Shane has a new job and therefore has a lot
less time to spend on QtNetwork. He, Peter and I have discussed how we
should maintain the module in the future. What we're proposing is that
Peter and I take over as joint maintainers since neither of us has the
time to
16 matches
Mail list logo
