Re: [Development] License for Qt Desktop Components

2012-05-21 Thread jens.bache-wiig
I agree and cleaning up the mess is long overdue. The non-commercial clause certainly makes no sense as you say and LGPL might be problematic when it comes to re-use of QML code. I got the permissions to move existing headers over to BSD and will use that for the new ones as well. The required c

[Development] License for Qt Desktop Components

2012-05-20 Thread Alberto Mardegan
Hi, what is the license for Qt Desktop Components [0]? The headers files don't seem to agree between each other: some are BSD, some LGPL and carry this notice: ** No Commercial Usage ** This file contains pre-release code and may not be distributed. ** You may use this file in accordanc