Re: [Development] LLVM and Qt

> On 30 Jul 2018, at 06:00, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Sunday, 29 July 2018 13:36:43 PDT Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: >> It would also be pretty nice to know if there is a policy with respect the >> llvm supported version. As they do not keep ABI compatibility distros >> nor

Re: [Development] LLVM and Qt

> On 30 Jul 2018, at 06:00, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Sunday, 29 July 2018 13:36:43 PDT Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: >> It would also be pretty nice to know if there is a policy with respect the >> llvm supported version. As they do not keep ABI compatibility distros >> nor

Re: [Development] LLVM and Qt

On Sunday, 29 July 2018 13:36:43 PDT Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > It would also be pretty nice to know if there is a policy with respect the > llvm supported version. As they do not keep ABI compatibility distros > normally are forced to ship from two to three versions. As I unders

Re: [Development] LLVM and Qt

El domingo, 29 de julio de 2018 17:40:04 -03 Allan Sandfeld Jensen escribió: [snip] Wow, that was fast for a sunday :-) Thanks! > You only need llvm for qdoc. You can probably remove qdoc on those > platforms, and generate the platform independent documentation packages on > hosts where it is sup

Re: [Development] LLVM and Qt

On Sonntag, 29. Juli 2018 22:36:43 CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Hi! As now qdoc has gained a dependency on llvm we noted that many Debian > ports will not be able to build it anymore, as llvm has (at least for now) > no support for them: > >

[Development] LLVM and Qt

Hi! As now qdoc has gained a dependency on llvm we noted that many Debian ports will not be able to build it anymore, as llvm has (at least for now) no support for them: I would like to know if there is any other plac