>
> > https://gitorious.org/qt-apps/showshoe (read-only mirror)
>
> You created a repo s*_h_*owshoe for the s*_n_*owshoe browser which is a
> little bit odd, is it a typo mistake or is it the real name of the repo?
>
> Regards,
>
> Sylvain Thibaut
>
Thanks a lot for that Sylvain !!
My fingers ar
On 01/28/2013 09:59 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Ahumada Sergio wrote:
>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> apps/snowshoe looks good to me, too :)
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suggest this to be under qt-apps/* instead in Gerrit.
>>
>> This is due to the mirroring from Gerrit to Gitorious:
>>
>>
On Jan 27, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Ahumada Sergio wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> apps/snowshoe looks good to me, too :)
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I suggest this to be under qt-apps/* instead in Gerrit.
>
> This is due to the mirroring from Gerrit to Gitorious:
>
> - apps/* is already taken on Gitorious, so we can't
> Hi,
>
> apps/snowshoe looks good to me, too :)
>
Hi,
I suggest this to be under qt-apps/* instead in Gerrit.
This is due to the mirroring from Gerrit to Gitorious:
- apps/* is already taken on Gitorious, so we can't mirror to apps/snowshow.git
- qt-apps/* is more in line with qt-labs/* etc
Hi,
apps/snowshoe looks good to me, too :)
--
Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho
openBossa @ INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Great :)
apps/snowshoe sounds like a good location to me, too. Caio, what do you think?
Simon
Knoll Lars wrote:
Approved. I'm really happy this gets contributed to the project.
Only question is where to place it inside the project hierarchy. Would
apps/showshoe be ok for everybody?
Cheers
Approved. I'm really happy this gets contributed to the project.
Only question is where to place it inside the project hierarchy. Would
apps/showshoe be ok for everybody?
Cheers,
Lars
On Jan 24, 2013, at 10:18 PM, Hausmann Simon
mailto:simon.hausm...@digia.com>> wrote:
Hi,
There haven't for
On Thursday 24 January 2013 21:18:30 Hausmann Simon wrote:
> There haven't fortunately been any objections yet to this proposal, also
> unfortunately also no approval yet from a Qt maintainer. Anyone willing to
> approve the inclusion?
How about I propose it and you approve? :)
- Paul
___
Hi,
There haven't fortunately been any objections yet to this proposal, also
unfortunately also no approval yet from a Qt maintainer.
Anyone willing to approve the inclusion? :)
Simon
Simon Hausmann wrote:
Hi all,
Now that Qt 5.0.0 is out I feel that it is a good time to also emphasize show
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that Qt 5.0.0 is out I feel that it is a good time to also emphasize
> show cases
> of Qt and QML as a technology. In Qt 4 we've had a couple of pretty nice
> demos
> in the source code, including a pretty neat demo browser.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Simon Hausmann
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that Qt 5.0.0 is out I feel that it is a good time to also emphasize show
> cases
> of Qt and QML as a technology. In Qt 4 we've had a couple of pretty nice demos
> in the source code, including a pretty neat demo browser. I
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Alberto Mardegan
wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 04:47 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>> So I got in touch with them and they're willing to contribute the code to
>> the Qt
>> project. I'm therefore seeking approval from the Qt project to importing
>> Snowshoe
>> into Gerrit,
On 01/11/2013 04:47 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> So I got in touch with them and they're willing to contribute the code to the
> Qt
> project. I'm therefore seeking approval from the Qt project to importing
> Snowshoe
> into Gerrit, with
[...]
I like the idea, but I'm a bit concerned about the fu
Hi all,
Now that Qt 5.0.0 is out I feel that it is a good time to also emphasize show
cases
of Qt and QML as a technology. In Qt 4 we've had a couple of pretty nice demos
in the source code, including a pretty neat demo browser. It serves as a
show-case
for QtWebKit's C++ API and the Qt widgets
14 matches
Mail list logo
