Re: [Development] Historical question

2014-04-03 Thread Mandeep Sandhu
>> #include >> instead of >> #include > > It's the name of the class. > > Besides, C++98 standardised on having no suffixes back in 1997. Ohso that's why one includes and not in std C++ (I always wondered why they didn't just do it like how it is in C). Thanks for this bit! -mandeep

Re: [Development] Historical question

2014-04-03 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em sex 04 abr 2014, às 08:07:22, Yves Bailly escreveu: > Greetings all, > > At the time of the move from Qt3 to Qt4, does anyone remember the reasons > given for using headers without extensions? e.g. > #include > instead of > #include It's the name of the class. Besides, C++98 standardised on

[Development] Historical question

2014-04-03 Thread Yves Bailly
Greetings all, At the time of the move from Qt3 to Qt4, does anyone remember the reasons given for using headers without extensions? e.g. #include instead of #include I think I read something explaining that choice at the time, but I'm enable to find it again... Just curious, no intent to st