On Tuesday 04 September 2012 15:53:21 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 4 de setembro de 2012 13.47.44, Sean Harmer wrote:
> > Yes. The trouble is there is no generic compare two floats when you don't
> > know if either of them are supposed to be near to/exactly zero. I have a
> > WIP patch
On terça-feira, 4 de setembro de 2012 13.47.44, Sean Harmer wrote:
> Yes. The trouble is there is no generic compare two floats when you don't
> know if either of them are supposed to be near to/exactly zero. I have a
> WIP patch here to try and resolve that but it is a very tricky problem.
>
> I
On Tuesday 04 September 2012 14:17:28 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 4 de setembro de 2012 12.48.20, Sean Harmer wrote:
> > I know that qFuzzyCompare() is not the best for comparing floating point
> > numbers, especially if one of the values is very very close to zero, but
> > it
> > work
On terça-feira, 4 de setembro de 2012 12.48.20, Sean Harmer wrote:
> I know that qFuzzyCompare() is not the best for comparing floating point
> numbers, especially if one of the values is very very close to zero, but it
> works on other platforms in this test.
qFuzzyCompare is supposed to be used
Hi list,
I have prepared the following change which rationalises the QtGui/math3d
classes to use float for both internal storage and in its API
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,33148
Unfortunately the CI systems's 32-bit Ubuntu 10.04 slave is failing one test,
namely widgets/graphicsv
