On sexta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2012 14.25.22, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 02:15 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Sergio Ahumada
> >
> > wrote:
> >> I wonder if these should be documented under dist/changes-5.0.0 ?
> >
> > Well, this specific example is remo
On 11/30/2012 02:15 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Sergio Ahumada
> wrote:
>> I wonder if these should be documented under dist/changes-5.0.0 ?
>
> Well, this specific example is removal of API added within 5.0.0,
> isn't it? So I don't see why it makes sense to docum
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Sergio Ahumada
wrote:
> I wonder if these should be documented under dist/changes-5.0.0 ?
Well, this specific example is removal of API added within 5.0.0,
isn't it? So I don't see why it makes sense to document that.
__
On 11/30/2012 02:06 PM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I take the blame for breaking the qtwebkit build by merging the
> QQuickItem::pos() API change, and fully agree with Simon that a good way
> to prevent these issues in the future is to send a notice to the mailing
> list about SIC changes.
>
Hello,
I take the blame for breaking the qtwebkit build by merging the
QQuickItem::pos() API change, and fully agree with Simon that a good way
to prevent these issues in the future is to send a notice to the mailing
list about SIC changes.
We're now trying to get https://codereview.qt-project
