On quinta-feira, 27 de junho de 2013 12.22.51, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Ok, explanation sounds reasonable to me, and given that the classes were
> documented as internal this is acceptable IMO.
Agreed. But we need an explanation on the QML side for QWindow:
> >> > --- a/src/gui/kernel/qwindow.h
> >> >
One issue found:
On quarta-feira, 26 de junho de 2013 13.49.40, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> class Q_GUI_EXPORT QAccessibleInterface
> {
> +protected:
> +virtual ~QAccessibleInterface();
> +
> public:
> -virtual ~QAccessibleInterface() {}
SC/BC BREAK
Change in protection level is not acce
