On 01/01/2012 04:51 PM, ext Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
> (...)
> The other options I imagined were GnuTLS [*], and using native SSL support
> should that exist.
>
> Today the backend separation is still around but it only complicates the
> code unless there truly are other backends to support.
On Tuesday, 3 de January de 2012 11.31.17, craig.sc...@csiro.au wrote:
> On 03/01/2012, at 11:27 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 3 de January de 2012 10.57.11, craig.sc...@csiro.au wrote:
> >> Unfortunately, OpenSSL is not part of the LSB, so if you want SSL support
> >> on linux and you
On 03/01/2012, at 11:27 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 de January de 2012 10.57.11, craig.sc...@csiro.au wrote:
>> Unfortunately, OpenSSL is not part of the LSB, so if you want SSL support on
>> linux and you want your application to be LSB compliant, you end up having
>> to link in t
On Tuesday, 3 de January de 2012 10.57.11, craig.sc...@csiro.au wrote:
> Unfortunately, OpenSSL is not part of the LSB, so if you want SSL support on
> linux and you want your application to be LSB compliant, you end up having
> to link in the OpenSSL libraries statically. That's not necessarily a
On 02/01/2012, at 11:06 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Andreas Aardal Hanssen
> wrote:
>> Hi Richard, looks really good! For Qt 4, the idea was to have several
>> backends like you write here. Still we ended up with only one, and it's not
>> really that much of a well
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/1/1 Andreas Aardal Hanssen :
>> [*] http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/ - dropped because it clearly staged
>> it was in early Alpha stage at the time, which I find to be really scary for
>> a security framework, and currently I
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Andreas Aardal Hanssen
wrote:
> Hi Richard, looks really good! For Qt 4, the idea was to have several
> backends like you write here. Still we ended up with only one, and it's not
> really that much of a well-define backend. Especially considering it's the
> only on
Hi,
2012/1/1 Andreas Aardal Hanssen :
> [*] http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/ - dropped because it clearly staged
> it was in early Alpha stage at the time, which I find to be really scary for
> a security framework, and currently I don't think the licensing looks very
> interesting. If OpenSSL
2012/1/1 Richard Moore
> I've just added a WIP guide to working on the SSL code in Qt. Please
> feel free to edit/extend/comment:
https://wiki.qt-project.org/Hacking_on_Qts_SSL_Support
>
Hi Richard, looks really good! For Qt 4, the idea was to have several
backends like you write here. Still we
I've just added a WIP guide to working on the SSL code in Qt. Please
feel free to edit/extend/comment:
https://wiki.qt-project.org/Hacking_on_Qts_SSL_Support
Cheers
Rich.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.o
10 matches
Mail list logo
