Am 03.07.2014 16:31, schrieb Friedemann Kleint:
> Hi,
>
> as a result of internal discussions at Digia, I have updated
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/ReportingBugsInQt a bit. The motivation
> behind this is that we want the bug reports as good as possible since
> many roles in the Qt project deal wit
On Friday 04 July 2014 11:28:28 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > - Asking people for a unit test in the bug tracker when we're not allowed
> > to include this in Qt without submission via gerrit seems likely to cause
> > conflict. I'd suggest either removing this section or explaining a
> > mechanism
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:41:37PM +0100, Richard Moore wrote:
> Overall this is very good, but there are a couple of things that could be
> improved:
>
> - Asking people for a unit test in the bug tracker when we're not allowed
> to include this in Qt without submission via gerrit seems likely to
Overall this is very good, but there are a couple of things that could be
improved:
- Asking people for a unit test in the bug tracker when we're not allowed
to include this in Qt without submission via gerrit seems likely to cause
conflict. I'd suggest either removing this section or explaining a
Hi,
as a result of internal discussions at Digia, I have updated
http://qt-project.org/wiki/ReportingBugsInQt a bit. The motivation
behind this is that we want the bug reports as good as possible since
many roles in the Qt project deal with them (developers, code reviewers,
release managers, p
