Re: [Development] Fwd: RFF: nullptr rules

2015-12-09 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 2015-12-09 12:23, Richard Moore wrote: > On 9 December 2015 at 15:14, Marc Mutz wrote: >> Arguments in favour: >> -Wzero-as..., >> and it makes no sense to have two sets of rules for headers and impl > > ​There's nothing that says we need to allow people to use that warning, ...except that i

Re: [Development] Fwd: RFF: nullptr rules

2015-12-09 Thread Marc Mutz
On Wednesday 09 December 2015 18:23:20 Richard Moore wrote: > > Arguments in favour: [...] > > -Wzero-as..., > > > > and it makes no sense to have two sets of rules for headers and impl > > ​There's nothing that says we need to allow people to use that warning, and > nothing stopping us disablin

[Development] Fwd: RFF: nullptr rules

2015-12-09 Thread Richard Moore
Resending from the right address. -- Forwarded message -- From: Richard Moore Date: 9 December 2015 at 17:22 Subject: Re: [Development] RFF: nullptr rules To: "development@qt-project.org" On 9 December 2015 at 15:14, Marc Mutz wrote: > - 0 as a nullptr constant is banned ex