Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-10 Thread lars.knoll
On 2/10/12 12:23 AM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On quinta-feira, 9 de fevereiro de 2012 20.00.40, John Layt wrote: >> 1) Change QLocale date/time format API to match ICU/CLDR features. >>This is >> by necessity a source-incompatible change. >> >> 2) Change the date/time format codes to match

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 9 de fevereiro de 2012 20.00.40, John Layt wrote: > 1) Change QLocale date/time format API to match ICU/CLDR features. This is > by necessity a source-incompatible change. > > 2) Change the date/time format codes to match ICU/CLDR codes. This is by > necessity a source and behav

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-09 Thread Hans-Peter Jansen
Dear Lars, On Thursday 09 February 2012, 21:00:40 John Layt wrote: > On Sunday 05 Feb 2012 14:12:48 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > > Is there anything that I have now forgotten that really *must* be > > in 5.0 (i.e. it really can't be done in a BC/SC way for Qt 5.1)? If > > you have such an item, p

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-09 Thread John Layt
On Sunday 05 Feb 2012 14:12:48 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > Is there anything that I have now forgotten that really *must* be in 5.0 > (i.e. it really can't be done in a BC/SC way for Qt 5.1)? If you have such > an item, please speak up, otherwise I'll consider the above exception list > as final

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-08 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Monday 06 February 2012 11:43:52 Anselmo L. S. Melo wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/05/2012 11:12 AM, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > > Is there anything that I have now forgotten that really *must* be in 5.0 > > (i.e. it really can't be done in a BC/SC way for Qt 5.1)? If you have such > > an item, pleas

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-08 Thread Kent Hansen
Yep. https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-24154 Kent Den 08. feb. 2012 13:40, skrev Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP/Oslo): > Ok, this one makes sense to finish IMO. > > Can you please add a Jira task for it, and make it a subtask for 20885? > > Lars > > On 2/8/12 1:20 PM, "ext Kent Hansen" wrote

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-08 Thread lars.knoll
Ok, this one makes sense to finish IMO. Can you please add a Jira task for it, and make it a subtask for 20885? Lars On 2/8/12 1:20 PM, "ext Kent Hansen" wrote: >Den 05. feb. 2012 15:12, skrev ext lars.kn...@nokia.com: >> Hi everybody, >[...] >> Is there anything that I have now forgotten that

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-08 Thread Kent Hansen
Den 05. feb. 2012 15:12, skrev ext lars.kn...@nokia.com: > Hi everybody, [...] > Is there anything that I have now forgotten that really *must* be in 5.0 > (i.e. it really can't be done in a BC/SC way for Qt 5.1)? If you have such > an item, please speak up, otherwise I'll consider the above except

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-08 Thread lars.knoll
On 2/7/12 4:08 PM, "Storm-Olsen Marius (Nokia-MP/Austin)" wrote: >On 07/02/2012 09:39, ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: >> On 07/02/2012 05:23, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: >>> On 2/7/12 6:53 AM, "ext Turunen Tuukka" >>> wrote: There needs to be a channel via which the info is exch

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-07 Thread marius.storm-olsen
On 07/02/2012 09:39, ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: > On 07/02/2012 05:23, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: >> On 2/7/12 6:53 AM, "ext Turunen Tuukka" >> wrote: >>> There needs to be a channel via which the info is exchanged, and >>> while getting the release out is in everybody's interest,

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-07 Thread marius.storm-olsen
On 07/02/2012 05:23, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > On 2/7/12 6:53 AM, "ext Turunen Tuukka" > wrote: >> There needs to be a channel via which the info is exchanged, and >> while getting the release out is in everybody's interest, there >> likely comes so much mails that it bloats the dev mailing

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-07 Thread shane.kearns
ruary 06, 2012 12:39 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha > > On Sunday 05 February 2012 14:12:48 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > > These items are still open and we'll need feedback on them: > > * network authentication and SLL erro

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-07 Thread lars.knoll
On 2/7/12 6:53 AM, "ext Turunen Tuukka" wrote: > >On 7.2.2012 8.48, "simo.f...@nokia.com" wrote: >> >>On 2/5/12 4:12 PM, "ext lars.kn...@nokia.com" >>wrote: >> >>>We also need to now create a team that focuses on creating packages out >>>of >>>our source code that we can then release. For the Al

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-06 Thread Turunen Tuukka
On 7.2.2012 8.48, "simo.f...@nokia.com" wrote: > > >On 2/5/12 4:12 PM, "ext lars.kn...@nokia.com" >wrote: > >>We also need to now create a team that focuses on creating packages out >>of >>our source code that we can then release. For the Alpha I propose that we >>only do source packages (grea

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-06 Thread simo.falt
On 2/5/12 4:12 PM, "ext lars.kn...@nokia.com" wrote: >We also need to now create a team that focuses on creating packages out of >our source code that we can then release. For the Alpha I propose that we >only do source packages (great if we get binaries though), we will however >need to prepar

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-06 Thread Quim Gil
Hi, can we have please a Qt 5 landing page where all this information cam be found or linked? It looks like the closest now is http://wiki.qt-project.org/5.0_Feature_Targets On 02/05/2012 06:12 AM, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > We're now starting with our feature freeze ... > We will soon

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-06 Thread Luís Gabriel Lima
> >* Smaller API additions (a function) are still ok > I think QTBUG-7369 fits in this case (smaller API additions). Here is the patch: http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,12312 Cheers, -- Luís Gabriel OpenBossa - INdT ___ Development mail

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-06 Thread Anselmo L. S. Melo
Hi, On 02/05/2012 11:12 AM, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > Is there anything that I have now forgotten that really *must* be in 5.0 > (i.e. it really can't be done in a BC/SC way for Qt 5.1)? If you have such > an item, please speak up, otherwise I'll consider the above exception list > as final.

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-06 Thread Jonas M. Gastal
On Sunday 05 February 2012 14:12:48 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > These items are still open and we'll need feedback on them: > * network authentication and SLL errors without stalling QNAM > (QTBUG-16251, QTBUG-19032) Peter did some of the work on this: http://codereview.qt-project.org/13834 I do

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 6 de February de 2012 10.56.56, morten.sor...@nokia.com wrote: > Is there anything that I have now forgotten that really *must* be in 5.0 > (i.e. it really can't be done in a BC/SC way for Qt 5.1)? If you have such > an item, please speak up, otherwise I'll consider the above exception l

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-06 Thread morten.sorvig
On Feb 5, 2012, at 3:12 PM, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: These items are still open and we'll need feedback on them: * QPA interface for native dialogs (QTBUG-20086) This one is done. Some platform filling-in of the API still remains, but the API itself is in g

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-05 Thread Turunen Tuukka
On 5.2.2012 16.12, "lars.kn...@nokia.com" wrote: >We also need to now create a team that focuses on creating packages out of >our source code that we can then release. For the Alpha I propose that we >only do source packages (great if we get binaries though), we will however >need to prepare for

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-05 Thread lars.knoll
On 2/5/12 4:27 PM, "ext Robin Burchell" wrote: >On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:12 PM, wrote: >> * finish codecForCStrings & codecForTr removal (QTBUG-21872) > >Relatedly - but I think it probably deserves separate mention - would >be the defaulting of passing raw bytes to QString to use utf8 >encodin

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-05 Thread Robin Burchell
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:12 PM, wrote: > * finish codecForCStrings & codecForTr removal (QTBUG-21872) Relatedly - but I think it probably deserves separate mention - would be the defaulting of passing raw bytes to QString to use utf8 encoding. It's a little more involved, but definitely somethin

[Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-05 Thread lars.knoll
Hi everybody, the weather in Europe seems to follow our schedule these days. It's freezing cold. We're now starting with our feature freeze for Qt 5. Let's go a bit through what this means and what we need to do next. We will soon have to start preparing the Alpha of Qt5. The purpose of the Alph