Re: [Development] FW: Tracing for applications

2022-01-26 Thread Lukast dev
Hi, I just noticed that Qt Creator has a nanotrace now. https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt-creator/qt-creator/+/376304 Kinda cool! Tracegen from Qt and nanotrace from Qt Creator is probably something that I was asking for originally in this thread. Case closed! :) ut 10. 12. 2019 o 14:55

Re: [Development] FW: Tracing for applications

2019-12-10 Thread Adam Light
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 1:06 PM Lukast dev wrote: > But stack sampling sometimes sucks because you don't see if the function > was called million times and thus it shows up in the profile > or it is called once and is expensive and thus it shows up as hot spot. > That's the benefit of tracing wher

Re: [Development] FW: Tracing for applications

2019-12-09 Thread Arnaud Clère
Hi, Le lun. 9 déc. 2019 à 22:05, Lukast dev a écrit : > But stack sampling sometimes sucks because you don't see if the function was > called million times and thus it shows up in the profile > or it is called once and is expensive and thus it shows up as hot spot. > That's the benefit of traci

Re: [Development] FW: Tracing for applications

2019-12-09 Thread Lukast dev
> Now, since the minitrace example seems to target MSVC, may I ask if > you tried Visual Studio performance analysis? Yes, I also have experience with Intel VTune that works quite nicely. There I enjoy flame graphs being done with this script from Intel VTune output file: https://github.com/brenda

Re: [Development] FW: Tracing for applications

2019-12-06 Thread Arnaud Clère
> -Original Message- > From: Milian Wolff > > On Mittwoch, 4. Dezember 2019 12:23:00 CET Lukast dev wrote: > > is there some Qt solution for producing traces used for performance > > analysis? > > > > There is on-going work for LTTNG and ETW in Qt I noticed, e.g. here > > https://coderevie