On Tuesday 25 November 2014 13:45:31 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > Actually, the reason that you *need* to pass -system-xxx on distributions
> > is to make sure that Qt will use the system lib. In other words, if you
> > forget your BuildRequires: tag, the build for Qt should fail
On Monday 24 November 2014 19:58:16 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday 24 November 2014 19:35:33 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > default configure options. At the moment, we have to pass an insane
> > > amount
> > > of -system-libfoo and -linked-libbar switches.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > I'm already c
On Monday 24 November 2014 19:35:33 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > default configure options. At the moment, we have to pass an insane amount
> > of -system-libfoo and -linked-libbar switches.
>
> Agreed.
>
> I'm already changing the D-Bus switch to default to linked unless you're on
> OS X. You cou
On Tuesday 25 November 2014 03:05:03 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Packagers can and should force the linking. This is about the
> > distribution- agnostic binaries we produce and are available from
> > qt-project.org.
>
> But my point is that the defaults in the configure scrip
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Packagers can and should force the linking. This is about the
> distribution- agnostic binaries we produce and are available from
> qt-project.org.
But my point is that the defaults in the configure script should be
friendlier to distribution packagers. For the binaries y
On Sunday 23 November 2014 19:55:53 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> The difference is with dlopen we can support more than one major version
> with the same binary making it possible to upgrade udev for instance
> without having to upgrade all of Qt at the same time. In this case it
> doesn't matter
On Sunday 23 November 2014, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Sunday 23 November 2014 11:53:46 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > QtWebKit and QtWebEngine does not support linking directly to libudev,
> > but they will only try to dlopen libudev.so.1 or libudev.so.0 in that
> > order, and being major versi
On Sunday 23 November 2014 11:53:46 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> QtWebKit and QtWebEngine does not support linking directly to libudev, but
> they will only try to dlopen libudev.so.1 or libudev.so.0 in that order, and
> being major version if a libudev.so.2 is made it can co-exists with
> libude
On Sunday 23 November 2014, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Sunday 23 November 2014 08:22:28 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Sorry, but as distribution packagers, we really no NOT like dlopened
>
> > libraries, for several reasons:
> Packagers can and should force the linking. This is about the distribution-
On Sunday 23 November 2014 08:22:28 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sorry, but as distribution packagers, we really no NOT like dlopened
> libraries, for several reasons:
Packagers can and should force the linking. This is about the distribution-
agnostic binaries we produce and are available from qt-projec
Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> Today I installed an snapshot of Qt 5.4.0 for Linux x86 on my Kubuntu
> 14.04 and found a problem: it links to libudev.so.0, while Ubuntu 14.04
> provides libudev.so.1.
>
> I was wondering if it would be a good idea for Qt to move from explicit
> linking to dlopen/dlsy
>There's dlopen code in QtSerialPort. Something went wrong with the build or
>the source code since that was introduced...
>
>It's a regression, we had that fixed.
Indeed. I created
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-42805
Regards
Kai
___
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 18:12:20 Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> > What library is that? I thought we did dlopen libudev...
>
> libQt5SerialPort
There's dlopen code in QtSerialPort. Something went wrong with the build or
the source code since that was introduced...
It's a regression, we had
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 November 2014 11:38:41 Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> > Today I installed an snapshot of Qt 5.4.0 for Linux x86 on my Kubuntu
> 14.04
> > and found a problem: it links to libudev.so.0, while Ubuntu 14.04
> provides
> > libude
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 11:38:41 Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> Today I installed an snapshot of Qt 5.4.0 for Linux x86 on my Kubuntu 14.04
> and found a problem: it links to libudev.so.0, while Ubuntu 14.04 provides
> libudev.so.1.
What library is that? I thought we did dlopen libudev...
--
Hello,
Today I installed an snapshot of Qt 5.4.0 for Linux x86 on my Kubuntu 14.04
and found a problem: it links to libudev.so.0, while Ubuntu 14.04 provides
libudev.so.1.
I was wondering if it would be a good idea for Qt to move from explicit
linking to dlopen/dlsym. That would help supporting d
16 matches
Mail list logo
