On 05.12.2012 20:37, André Pönitz wrote:
> I also don't think that establishing a system in parallel to the existing
> Approver/Maintainers system is the best way to proceed. I actually doubt a
> lot of maintainers want to become mad, scientifically or not, just to be
> able to fix FAQ entries rela
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 06:18:57PM +0100, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 05, 2012 05:15:34 PM Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > On 5 December 2012 17:06, Mitch Curtis
> > wrote:
> > > How can I edit a FAQ at http://qt-project.org/faq? I have a devnet
> > > account, but apparently that doe
On Wednesday, December 05, 2012 05:15:34 PM Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On 5 December 2012 17:06, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> > How can I edit a FAQ at http://qt-project.org/faq? I have a devnet account,
> > but apparently that doesn't help.
>
> You can't, unless you're an admin.
>
> That's one of the
On 5 December 2012 17:06, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> How can I edit a FAQ at http://qt-project.org/faq? I have a devnet account,
> but apparently that doesn't help.
You can't, unless you're an admin.
That's one of the many things that hopefully are going to change (cf.
what's going on on web@ mailin
How can I edit a FAQ at http://qt-project.org/faq? I have a devnet account, but
apparently that doesn't help.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
