On Monday 24. September 2012 13.36.10 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 23.09.2012, 14:25, "Frederik Gladhorn" :
> > Hi,
> > since we were discussing how to maintain QDoc and how to fix issues, I
> > poked at doxygen again.
> > I also sent a mail to it's maintainer who responded quickly and friendly.
> >
23.09.2012, 14:25, "Frederik Gladhorn" :
> Hi,
> since we were discussing how to maintain QDoc and how to fix issues, I poked
> at
> doxygen again.
> I also sent a mail to it's maintainer who responded quickly and friendly.
> I'm not sure if we want to go down this route, but it seems an option
>I'm not sure if we want to go down this route (doxygen), but it seems an
>option to me.
We have discussed it many times. The management decision has always been to
proceed with qdoc. I don't feel strongly either way, but if I'm asked I would
say we should stay with qdoc and just move qdoc grad
Hi,
since we were discussing how to maintain QDoc and how to fix issues, I poked at
doxygen again.
I also sent a mail to it's maintainer who responded quickly and friendly.
I'm not sure if we want to go down this route, but it seems an option to me.
It means a lot of work, but so does maintaining
g
Emne: Re: [Development] Documentation and Modularization
On Wednesday September 19 2012, Gladhorn Frederik wrote:
[...]
> Since we don't see a way to fix the modularized build of the docs without
> big issues (predictive links seem hard to get right and we couldn't show
> warnings a
On Wednesday September 19 2012, Gladhorn Frederik wrote:
[...]
> Since we don't see a way to fix the modularized build of the docs without
> big issues (predictive links seem hard to get right and we couldn't show
> warnings about them easily), we propose to actually make use of a mixed
> approach
Hi,
while we all love our documentation we also need to work on polishing it some
more ;)
Today there was a discussion in Oslo about the "how to link between modules"
problems we're facing with qdoc.
I'll try to illustrate the problem and show the solution we would like to
propose.
We have two
