On 3/19/12 9:19 AM, "ext Thorbjørn Martsum" wrote:
>Hi Lars
>
>You are the boss :) - and I am not disagreeing that this should happen
>rather sooner then later (it is actually happening very late if the final
>release plan still says june),
>but I however think it would be better (in the future)
On segunda-feira, 19 de março de 2012 09.19.56, Thorbjørn Martsum wrote:
> but I however think it would be better (in the future) to announce such an
> api soft freeze a few days before it happens.
Please note that:
1) the announcement didn't change much. You were already supposed to be
following
Hi Lars
You are the boss :) - and I am not disagreeing that this should happen
rather sooner then later (it is actually happening very late if the final
release plan still says june),
but I however think it would be better (in the future) to announce such an
api soft freeze a few days before it ha
On 3/18/12 9:05 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira"
wrote:
>On domingo, 18 de março de 2012 19.55.53, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
>> * No more source incompatible changes to features/API that are new in Qt
>> 5, unless approved by the module's maintainer after a discussion on the
>> mailing list
>
>Does th
On domingo, 18 de março de 2012 19.55.53, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> * No more source incompatible changes to features/API that are new in Qt
> 5, unless approved by the module's maintainer after a discussion on the
> mailing list
Does this include source-incompatible changes that restore compa
Hi everybody,
there are quite a few people meeting up in Oslo this week, and we'll try
to finish up the Qt 5 alpha there. For this reason I'd like everybody to
restrain themselves in what they submit to the master branch. The main
focus needs to be to get the alpha, so please focus on staging only
