Re: [Development] Coding style for lambdas, particularly their open-brace

2017-09-19 Thread Edward Welbourne
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Edward Welbourne mailto:edward.welbou...@qt.io>> wrote: >> We have a draft policy for lambdas at [0], in a section that begins with >> >> Note: This section is not an accepted convention yet. >> This section serves as baseline for further discussions. >> >> Tha

Re: [Development] Coding style for lambdas, particularly their open-brace

2017-08-18 Thread Mark Gaiser
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Edward Welbourne wrote: > Hi all, > > We have a draft policy for lambdas at [0], in a section that begins with > > Note: This section is not an accepted convention yet. > This section serves as baseline for further discussions. > > That section is now a quarte

Re: [Development] Coding style for lambdas, particularly their open-brace

2017-08-18 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
18.08.2017, 15:17, "Edward Welbourne" : > Hi all, > > We have a draft policy for lambdas at [0], in a section that begins with > >   Note: This section is not an accepted convention yet. >   This section serves as baseline for further discussions. > > That section is now a quarter decade old; it'

[Development] Coding style for lambdas, particularly their open-brace

2017-08-18 Thread Edward Welbourne
Hi all, We have a draft policy for lambdas at [0], in a section that begins with Note: This section is not an accepted convention yet. This section serves as baseline for further discussions. That section is now a quarter decade old; it's had a few updates since it was added (2015-02-27), so