On Tuesday, 3 July 2018 07:37:25 PDT Edward Welbourne wrote:
>> Derived:Derived(Type arg, Mode um, Form ent)
>>
>> : Base(arg)
>>
>> , mem(um)
>> , ber(ent)
>> {}
Thiago Macieira (16 July 2018 17:48)
> There are spaces before these commas, so they don't conform to coding
> style now. New
On Tuesday, 3 July 2018 07:37:25 PDT Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Derived:Derived(Type arg, Mode um, Form ent)
>
> : Base(arg)
>
> , mem(um)
> , ber(ent)
> {}
There are spaces before these commas, so they don't conform to coding style
now. Newlines are whitespace, so even if you flushed
I (3 July 2018 16:37) wrote:
> [0] https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Coding_Style
>
> I propose to follow (under "Whitespace") the list item
>
> * Surround binary operators with spaces
>
> with
>
> * Leave a space after each comma
>
> Any objections, or improved wordings ?
Hearing no objections or suggest
I notice that our coding style [0] doesn't actually say out loud that we
expect a space after each comma (and none before). Its sole mention of
comma is that it goes at a line-end, unlike operators at line-start, on
a continued line. Yet the Qt code-base is mostly consistent about this
and I've s
