On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> On 09/21/2013 12:15 AM, Alan Alpert wrote:
>>
>> A while ago it came up that the rules for license headers in QML files
>> isn't clearly defined. Here's my suggestion for how to define it, and if
>> the project likes the idea we can get a lega
On 09/21/2013 12:15 AM, Alan Alpert wrote:
> A while ago it came up that the rules for license headers in QML files
> isn't clearly defined. Here's my suggestion for how to define it, and if
> the project likes the idea we can get a legal check and then fix up the
> infrastructure to follow (sanity
On 9/30/13 7:00 PM, "Oswald Buddenhagen"
wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:15:47PM -0700, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> Looking at the file sizes, I recommend excluding QML files under
>> "tests" from requiring a license header if they have <=15 LoC.
>>
>in general i support this proposal, but as i said
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:15:47PM -0700, Alan Alpert wrote:
> Looking at the file sizes, I recommend excluding QML files under
> "tests" from requiring a license header if they have <=15 LoC.
>
in general i support this proposal, but as i said elsewhere i think you
are being a bit too short-sighte
A while ago it came up that the rules for license headers in QML files
isn't clearly defined. Here's my suggestion for how to define it, and if
the project likes the idea we can get a legal check and then fix up the
infrastructure to follow (sanity bot and license-check test).
Current rule is roug
