Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online

2012-10-09 Thread Sébastien Fricker
r >> Nokia, Guidance Team >> >> From: development-bounces+bill.king=nokia@qt-project.org >> [mailto:development-bounces+bill.king=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of >> ext Sébastien Fricker >> Sent: Sunday, 7 October 2012 9:08 AM >> To: developme

Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online

2012-10-08 Thread bill.king
October 2012 9:08 AM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online One possible request: entry marking in the source reports, ie: QString QMimeType::filterString() const From: http://download.froglogic.com/public/qt5-squishcoco-report/libQtWidgets

Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online

2012-10-07 Thread Sébastien Fricker
> One possible request: entry marking in the source reports, ie: > QString QMimeType::filterString() const > From: > http://download.froglogic.com/public/qt5-squishcoco-report/libQtWidgets/source_147.html > > Was the test entered but the if lines not tested? > > Another example: void QMimeTypePr

Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online

2012-09-29 Thread Sébastien Fricker
Hi, providing a code coverage analysis of Qt is a living project and so we would be happy of any feedback of the Qt developers. Issues and suggestions can be addressed to the Squish Coco forum: http://www.froglogic.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=10 We found that it is better to not put issues on metr

Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online

2012-09-27 Thread bill.king
+bill.king=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of ext Sébastien Fricker Sent: Thursday, 27 September 2012 10:15 AM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online > Overall the coverage was less than I expected, so I started reading the > source file

Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online

2012-09-27 Thread Sébastien Fricker
> Would you include add-ons in the reports too? Actually we start with QtBase. Of course in the future, the goal is to provide an analysis on the whole Qt source. > Anyway to get run output logs from failed tests? Good suggestion, will be present in the next daily coverage report. Sébastien __

Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online

2012-09-27 Thread Lorn Potter
On 27/09/12 04:06, Harri Porten wrote: > Hi! > > We started publishing code coverage results of Qt 5 unit test runs as > produced by our tool Squish Coco: > > http://download.froglogic.com/public/qt5-squishcoco-report/ (results) > > http://download.froglogic.com/public/effectively-testing-

Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online

2012-09-27 Thread Sébastien Fricker
> Overall the coverage was less than I expected, so I started reading the > source files list starting from lowest coverage and found some surprising >results, e.g. qmimedata.cpp 0% coverage, qsettings.cpp nearly 0% > coverage although I know there are tests for these. > In the execution list at >

Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online

2012-09-27 Thread Rohan McGovern
Harri Porten said: > Hi! > > We started publishing code coverage results of Qt 5 unit test runs as > produced by our tool Squish Coco: > >http://download.froglogic.com/public/qt5-squishcoco-report/ (results) > > http://download.froglogic.com/public/effectively-testing-qt5-using-squishcoc

Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online

2012-09-27 Thread Jedrzej Nowacki
On Wednesday 26. September 2012 20.06.21 Harri Porten wrote: > Feedback of any kind is welcome. Nice! Jędrek ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

[Development] Code coverage statistics online

2012-09-26 Thread Harri Porten
Hi! We started publishing code coverage results of Qt 5 unit test runs as produced by our tool Squish Coco: http://download.froglogic.com/public/qt5-squishcoco-report/ (results) http://download.froglogic.com/public/effectively-testing-qt5-using-squishcoco/ (setup and example) >From that