Le lundi 25 janvier 2016 à 10:20 +, Rutledge Shawn a écrit :
> > On 23 Jan 2016, at 19:52, Sean Harmer wrote:
> >
> > On 23/01/2016 12:45, Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > The OpenGL acceleration in Charts module is really impressive
> > > > ...
> > > Unfortunately part of the tr
On 23 Jan 2016, at 19:52, Sean Harmer
mailto:s...@theharmers.co.uk>> wrote:
On 23/01/2016 12:45, Uwe Rathmann wrote:
Hi,
The OpenGL acceleration in Charts module is really impressive ...
Unfortunately part of the truth is, that the performance of the software
renderer does not necessarily be tha
Le samedi 23 janvier 2016 à 12:45 +, Uwe Rathmann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> > The OpenGL acceleration in Charts module is really impressive ...
>
> Unfortunately part of the truth is, that the performance of the
> software
> renderer does not necessarily be that far behind.
The test I did with QCh
On 23/01/2016 12:45, Uwe Rathmann wrote:
Hi,
The OpenGL acceleration in Charts module is really impressive ...
Unfortunately part of the truth is, that the performance of the software
renderer does not necessarily be that far behind.
Now try it against OpenGL with 100k points rendering to
Hi,
> The OpenGL acceleration in Charts module is really impressive ...
Unfortunately part of the truth is, that the performance of the software
renderer does not necessarily be that far behind.
An example: in a test program I'm creating a polygon of 1 points in
an area of 1000x1000 using
Hi,
I have few naive questions about Charts and DataVis modules.
1) As I understand DataVis module is mainly a 3d data visualization
module while Charts is mainly a 1d data visualization module. Why not
merging them to a unique data visualization module?
In my lab scientists are interested in plo
