On 19/11/13 17:02, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I've just updated the Changelog for 5.2.0 with the output from the script that
> I've just uploaded at https://codereview.qt-project.org/71641. The changelog
The help message still refer to header-diff BTW.
my 2 cents,
Chris
> update is at https://code
On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 14:49:43, Alan Alpert wrote:
> My apologies, I did not notice. That raises two questions:
>
> 1) Should the qtbase changelog contain all changes from essential
> modules, or just the ones in the qtbase repository? i.e. should I
> merge the qtdeclarative cha
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 13:21:15, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> The * is for some interesting things I noticed. Of the 3 usages, 2 of
>> them were after Thiago's original email. Which means that if he had
>> run the script on QtDec
On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 13:21:15, Alan Alpert wrote:
> The * is for some interesting things I noticed. Of the 3 usages, 2 of
> them were after Thiago's original email. Which means that if he had
> run the script on QtDeclarative as well, he'd have gotten only 1 hit.
> 2 of them had
On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 13:08:28, Alan Alpert wrote:
> I'm happy to have it warn though. That's +0, and a comment along the
> lines of "ChangeLog: Commit message references a task but does not
> include a ChangeLog message. If the task is >=P2 and affected previous
> versions, plea
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 07:49:03, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 12:49:11, Marc Mutz wrote:
>> > I have found that significantly more than 50% of commits that touched
>> > qtbase/src/wid
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Monday, November 25, 2013 06:26:38 PM Alan Alpert wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Thiago Macieira
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 12:49:11, Marc Mutz wrote:
>> >> I have found that significantly more tha
On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 20:44:13, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:31:07AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 19:47:24, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > I don't see a contradiction to what I was proposing: -1 if task-number
> > >
On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 07:49:03, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 12:49:11, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > I have found that significantly more than 50% of commits that touched
> > qtbase/src/widgets since v5.1.0 end up in the change log. It could be a
> > c
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:31:07AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 19:47:24, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > I don't see a contradiction to what I was proposing: -1 if task-number is
> > present, too, otherwise just warn.
>
> Warn if a task-number is present, no mess
On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 19:47:24, Marc Mutz wrote:
> I don't see a contradiction to what I was proposing: -1 if task-number is
> present, too, otherwise just warn.
Warn if a task-number is present, no message otherwise.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Softw
On Monday, November 25, 2013 06:26:38 PM Alan Alpert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Thiago Macieira
>
> wrote:
> > On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 12:49:11, Marc Mutz wrote:
> >> I have found that significantly more than 50% of commits that touched
> >> qtbase/src/widgets sinc
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 12:49:11, Marc Mutz wrote:
>> I have found that significantly more than 50% of commits that touched
>> qtbase/src/widgets since v5.1.0 end up in the change log. It could be a
>> comment unless a Task
On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 12:49:11, Marc Mutz wrote:
> I have found that significantly more than 50% of commits that touched
> qtbase/src/widgets since v5.1.0 end up in the change log. It could be a
> comment unless a Task-number is also present, in which case the bot could
> -1 t
On Monday, November 25, 2013 12:20:05 PM Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> On 25.11.2013 10:53, Marc Mutz wrote:
> >> There were exactly 31 commits with [ChangeLog]. Please start using it
> >> more.
> >
> > Samuel Gaist (thanks) suggested in PM to add a check to the sanity bot.
>
> How would the bot know
On 25.11.2013 10:53, Marc Mutz wrote:
>> There were exactly 31 commits with [ChangeLog]. Please start using it more.
>
> Samuel Gaist (thanks) suggested in PM to add a check to the sanity bot.
How would the bot know whether a change is worth a changelog entry?
Cheers,
Joerg
___
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 05:02:32 AM Thiago Macieira wrote:
> There were exactly 31 commits with [ChangeLog]. Please start using it more.
Samuel Gaist (thanks) suggested in PM to add a check to the sanity bot.
Good idea? I think it is.
Thanks,
Marc
--
Marc Mutz | Senior Software Engineer
I've just updated the Changelog for 5.2.0 with the output from the script that
I've just uploaded at https://codereview.qt-project.org/71641. The changelog
update is at https://codereview.qt-project.org/71642.
There were exactly 31 commits with [ChangeLog]. Please start using it more.
Here's th
18 matches
Mail list logo
