On Monday, 31 July 2017 00:07:35 PDT Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> Suppose you create a new feature in commit A for Qt 5.x. The commit
> message has a change log entry. After a while A has to be reverted. You
> won't have time to fix the issue properly for 5.x. The git history for
> 5.x still contains t
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:07:35AM +0200, Jörg Bornemann wrote:
> Suppose you create a new feature in commit A for Qt 5.x. The commit
> message has a change log entry. After a while A has to be reverted. You
> won't have time to fix the issue properly for 5.x. The git history for
> 5.x still con
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:11:41 +0200
Friedemann Kleint wrote:
> have a look at https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/201164/ for the
> Perl script.
Are the two scripts competing or do they complement each other in some way?
Christian
___
Development m
Hi,
have a look at https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/201164/ for the
Perl script.
Friedemann
--
Friedemann Kleint
The Qt Company GmbH
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/developme
Joerg Bornemann (31 July 2017 09:07)
> Suppose you create a new feature in commit A for Qt 5.x. The commit
> message has a change log entry. After a while A has to be
> reverted. You won't have time to fix the issue properly for 5.x. The
> git history for 5.x still contains the change log entry -
Suppose you create a new feature in commit A for Qt 5.x. The commit
message has a change log entry. After a while A has to be reverted. You
won't have time to fix the issue properly for 5.x. The git history for
5.x still contains the change log entry - now erronously.
Is the script that create
