Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-08 Thread Jeff Mitchell
On 12/08/2011 07:01 AM, Atlant Schmidt wrote: > One use case Stephen didn’t mention is the case where you decide > to make some sort of global change to the project. (I don’t know if it’s > true of the Alassian wiki, but) In a pure WYSIWIG system, you’ll get to > make that change individual

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-08 Thread André Pönitz
On Thursday 08 December 2011 13:01:43 ext Atlant Schmidt wrote: > [...] to echo and amplify what Stephen has said: > > WYSIWYG editors may be easier for novice wikipedians to use, but > markup-based editors are far easier for experienced people to use > and get the results precisely corre

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-08 Thread Atlant Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 20:00 To: Jeff Mitchell Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org On Wednesday, December 07, 2011 14:23:27 you wrote: > On 12/7/2011 9:26 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > The worst t

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-07 Thread Jeff Mitchell
On 12/07/2011 07:59 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > == with headers like this == > > === and subheaders like this === > > > > both for easy copy/pasting into a wiki and because readers (of > appropriate mailing lists) recognise what it means. > > > > Try pasting an email like that into confluen

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-07 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Wednesday, December 07, 2011 14:23:27 you wrote: > On 12/7/2011 9:26 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > The worst thing about Confluence is that it can only be edited in rich > > text mode. There is no markup behind that which you can switch to in > > order to edit pages. > > > > > It is highly frust

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-07 Thread Jeff Mitchell
On 12/7/2011 9:26 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > The worst thing about Confluence is that it can only be edited in rich > text mode. There is no markup behind that which you can switch to in > order to edit pages. Yes, this is new in Confluence 4.0 (which admittedly I have not used yet). The reason f

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-07 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Wednesday, December 07, 2011 09:03:23 Jeff Mitchell wrote: > I know that a lot of open source projects will not use any non-FOSS (KDE > for instance), but my understanding was that Qt uses JIRA because > although proprietary, it's the best in its class, which makes it very > useful. Crowd is als

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-07 Thread Jeff Mitchell
On 12/07/2011 03:54 AM, Robin Burchell wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:22 AM, wrote: >> Without entering into the "which is better" debate, Confluence can be used >> for free for open source projects > > I'm not trying to be an alarmist, I do know that, and that is good. > Props to Atlassian

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-07 Thread alexandra.leisse
On 7.12.2011 2:28 AM, "ext Jeff Mitchell" wrote: >On 12/6/2011 12:57 PM, Daniel Molkentin wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> to avoid user account fragmentation, we implemented an Single Sign On >> (SSO) scheme (almost) from the start that 'works' across all the >> important qt-project.org sites we

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-07 Thread Robin Burchell
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:22 AM, wrote: > Without entering into the "which is better" debate, Confluence can be used > for free for open source projects I'm not trying to be an alarmist, I do know that, and that is good. Props to Atlassian for offering that. I still don't like it. Just because i

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-07 Thread Craig.Scott
On 07/12/2011, at 5:37 PM, Robin Burchell wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Jeff Mitchell wrote: >> At Qt Contributor Day in SF I talked to Alexandra Leisse about >> MediaWiki. Specifically, she hates MediaWiki, and I suggested moving to >> Confluence, as it's a much, much, much, much nic

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-06 Thread Robin Burchell
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Jeff Mitchell wrote: > At Qt Contributor Day in SF I talked to Alexandra Leisse about > MediaWiki. Specifically, she hates MediaWiki, and I suggested moving to > Confluence, as it's a much, much, much, much nicer wiki than MediaWiki, I think this is a tiny bit over

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-06 Thread Jeff Mitchell
On 12/6/2011 12:57 PM, Daniel Molkentin wrote: > Hello everyone, > > to avoid user account fragmentation, we implemented an Single Sign On > (SSO) scheme (almost) from the start that 'works' across all the > important qt-project.org sites we have so far: > > - codereview.qt-project.org (Gerrit) >

Re: [Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-06 Thread Robin Burchell
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Daniel Molkentin wrote: > An obvious solution is to write Crowd authenticators for the two > applications, so it doesn't need to happen on the web server level. For > MediaWiki, somebody already wrote a plugin, which unfortunately is > broken (for references, see th

[Development] Call for Volunteers: SSO-improvements for qt-project.org

2011-12-06 Thread Daniel Molkentin
Hello everyone, to avoid user account fragmentation, we implemented an Single Sign On (SSO) scheme (almost) from the start that 'works' across all the important qt-project.org sites we have so far: - codereview.qt-project.org (Gerrit) - wiki.qt-project.org (MediaWiki) - bugreports.qt.nokia.com (J