Tirsdag 20. august 2013 14.47.46 skrev Stephen Kelly:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't seen any other mails about this. Is anyone who is capable of doing
> something about it aware of the problem that qtbase CI keeps failing for
> reasons unrelated to the patches under test?
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Nicolás Alvarez
wrote:
> > In the long run if we want to have a mechanism that detects what has
> been changed and which tests should be run, then we need to start designing
> it. How would it work?
>
> I don't think you can reliably figure out when a test is or is
2013/8/21 Sarajärvi Tony :
> Hi
>
> The problem was test cases that don't pass. We have a patch that will address
> these issues: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,63361
> Too bad it stumbled upon a machine that apparently was broken (don't
> understand why, since they should be clones).
ilto:development-bounces+tony.sarajarvi=digia@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Stephen Kelly
> Sent: 20. elokuuta 2013 15:48
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] CI failing regularly
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I haven't seen any other mails about this. Is anyo
Hi,
I haven't seen any other mails about this. Is anyone who is capable of doing
something about it aware of the problem that qtbase CI keeps failing for
reasons unrelated to the patches under test?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.ci-reports
Is anything being done about it? It see
