On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> There is no need for nominating for contribution. Anyone can contribute. Being
> a maintainer of something is what requires dedication.
>
> Unfortunately, for all sysadmin-related jobs, we have legal issues that need
> to be dealt with, so
> Unfortunately, for all sysadmin-related jobs, we have legal issues that need
> to be dealt with, so it's not as simple as starting to do it. I don't know how
> to go from here.
I would personally like to see as much Open Governance in the Qt
Project as possible. This is also relevant for sysadmi
On terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2012 13.33.22, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I think so ... certainly nobody seems passionate about it, at least.
> > And nobody has it as one of their primary responsibilities as far as I
> > know.
>
> How can we fix this issue ? What is the workflow for nominating n
Hi,
> I think so ... certainly nobody seems passionate about it, at least.
> And nobody has it as one of their primary responsibilities as far as I
> know.
How can we fix this issue ? What is the workflow for nominating new
contributors for this role ? Something similar as for approvals ? Are
the
Laszlo Papp said:
>
> The Qt Project lacks Jira maintainance man power, or what is the reason
> behind ?
>
I think so ... certainly nobody seems passionate about it, at least.
And nobody has it as one of their primary responsibilities as far as I
know.
__
> Off-Topic
> -
>
> I don't see this email in j...@qt-project.org mailing list. So that's
> maybe why you haven't gotten any answer yet.
>
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/jeg/2012-May/thread.html
I am unsure what is wrong with me to clearly explain the significance
of this issue, a
On 05/07/2012 06:17 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:10 PM, wrote:
>> This sounds like something we should have.
>> e.g. QTPLAYGROUND as the project (instead of QTBUG) and one or more
>> components for each playground project.
>>
>> Does anyone from the JIRA experts group have a
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:10 PM, wrote:
> This sounds like something we should have.
> e.g. QTPLAYGROUND as the project (instead of QTBUG) and one or more
> components for each playground project.
>
> Does anyone from the JIRA experts group have a comment?
Could we please get help with this ? It
enture@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Denis Shienkov
> Sent: 02 May 2012 18:06
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Bugreports for Playground projects
>
> Hello all.
>
> I am
Hello all.
I am also interested in this question.
Say please, where and how can get a bug-tracker for projects from a playground?
Is this possible?
Without such features are very hard to make a contribution to the development.
For example, users are forced to send bugs to the forums (which are
Hey,
JIRA does not currently have entries for playground projects (for
instance a playground project, and then the relevant components). Is
it possible to ask for something like that, or is there a better
approach ? JIRA addition would probably require the extension on
demand when a gerrit project
11 matches
Mail list logo
