On 18.11.13 11:49, "Milian Wolff" wrote:
>On Monday 18 November 2013 10:11:40 Knoll Lars wrote:
>> Yes, once the patch is in 5.x and it affects 4.8 as well, it¹s usually
>>ok
>> to back port.
>
>I ask b/c back then Eskil wrote:
>
>> Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt Sep 5, 2012
>> Patch Set 4:
On Monday 18 November 2013 12:46:24 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Monday 18 November 2013 11:06:57 Milian Wolff wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'd like to ask again whether I could backport some performance
> > improvements in QTextLayout/QTextEngine from Qt5 to Qt4.
> >
> > Most notably there is http
On Monday 18 November 2013 11:06:57 Milian Wolff wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'd like to ask again whether I could backport some performance improvements
> in QTextLayout/QTextEngine from Qt5 to Qt4.
>
> Most notably there is https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,34112 which
> effects us in Kate/KD
On Monday 18 November 2013 10:11:40 Knoll Lars wrote:
> Yes, once the patch is in 5.x and it affects 4.8 as well, it¹s usually ok
> to back port.
I ask b/c back then Eskil wrote:
> Eskil Abrahamsen BlomfeldtSep 5, 2012
> Patch Set 4: Do not submit
> I don't think these P3 optimization
Yes, once the patch is in 5.x and it affects 4.8 as well, it¹s usually ok
to back port.
Cheers,
Lars
On 18.11.13 11:06, "Milian Wolff" wrote:
>Hey all,
>
>I'd like to ask again whether I could backport some performance
>improvements
>in QTextLayout/QTextEngine from Qt5 to Qt4.
>
>Most notably
Hey all,
I'd like to ask again whether I could backport some performance improvements
in QTextLayout/QTextEngine from Qt5 to Qt4.
Most notably there is https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,34112 which
effects us in Kate/KDE as outlined here:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225228
Th
