Fabian Kosmale (31 May 2024 10:00) wrote (inter alia),
> I think that should be part of the normal API review process that
> triggers after FF.
Two things:
* the one after FF is an API *change* review
* delaying until then just slows that process down.
If there are open objections to the present
Hi,
I don't think it's necessary to still flag the Android integration as TP
like it was in 6.7, we already iterated on the API to cover the initial
use case, and I think that one is covered by now in a way that we don't
expect to change.
I think there is a discussion to be had about how we ca
Hi,
As noted before, we need to have a discussion on the new Android/Java
bindings and how they fit in with the QML language and various Qt
modules. See for example
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtdeclarative/+/563564 and
various follow-up changes.
I suggest we call the Android/Jav
