On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 07:49:37PM +0200, Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> > what are you talking about? https://codereview.qt-project.org/201311 is up
> > for
> > more than a month already.
> [Kalinowski Maurice]
> And it is visible now after Frederik moved it. As I wrote in my initial mail,
> there
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 14:49:37 -03 Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> > what are you talking about? https://codereview.qt-project.org/201311 is up
> > for more than a month already.
>
> [Kalinowski Maurice]
> And it is visible now after Frederik moved it. As I wrote in my initial
> mail, there has
> >
> what are you talking about? https://codereview.qt-project.org/201311 is up for
> more than a month already.
[Kalinowski Maurice]
And it is visible now after Frederik moved it. As I wrote in my initial mail,
there has been some work done before...
Maurice
_
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:06:23PM +, Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> a new repository is needed.
>
what are you talking about? https://codereview.qt-project.org/201311 is
up for more than a month already.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-proj
On Monday, September 4, 2017 11:58:13 AM CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > True, but we can re-evaluate if it is not working, modularization is
> > harder
> > in general as it requires some code changes. Regarding the "two weeks"
> > delay, it is mostly a social problem, as we can not agree on how of
OK, I'll create the repository, we can still merge several projects later as
seen fit.
Cheers,
Frederik
On fredag 1. september 2017 14.06.23 CEST Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Most of you might have noticed the IoT related discussion happening on this
> mailing list. If not, che
On Monday, 4 September 2017 11:04:24 -03 jedrzej.nowa...@qt.io wrote:
> True, but we can re-evaluate if it is not working, modularization is harder
> in general as it requires some code changes. Regarding the "two weeks"
> delay, it is mostly a social problem, as we can not agree on how often qt5
>
On Monday, September 4, 2017 9:14:37 AM CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Saturday, 2 September 2017 16:54:03 -03 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
> > On piątek, 1 września 2017 08:38:19 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > I'm also wondering if we shouldn't have a bigger repo for IoT-related
> > > things, inst
On Saturday, 2 September 2017 16:54:03 -03 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
> On piątek, 1 września 2017 08:38:19 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > I'm also wondering if we shouldn't have a bigger repo for IoT-related
> > things, instead of creating a small one for each thing.
>
> Currently, from CI and rele
> On 2 Sep 2017, at 21:54, Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
>
> On piątek, 1 września 2017 08:38:19 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> I'm also wondering if we shouldn't have a bigger repo for IoT-related
>> things, instead of creating a small one for each thing.
>
> Currently, from CI and releasing perspec
On piątek, 1 września 2017 08:38:19 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I'm also wondering if we shouldn't have a bigger repo for IoT-related
> things, instead of creating a small one for each thing.
Currently, from CI and releasing perspective heaving dozen of small repos is
easier and faster. All th
Hey,
> > One of the items mentioned has been CoAP and that it would make a
> > great addition to Qt. Interestingly, there has been discussions
> > between the Qt Company and Witekio about exactly this topic. Thanks to
> > the people at Witekio these resulted in actual code already available
> > to
On Friday, 1 September 2017 05:06:23 PDT Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Most of you might have noticed the IoT related discussion happening on this
> mailing list. If not, check here in the archive:
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-August/030723.html
>
> One
Hi everyone,
Most of you might have noticed the IoT related discussion happening on this
mailing list. If not, check here in the archive:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-August/030723.html
One of the items mentioned has been CoAP and that it would make a great
addition t
14 matches
Mail list logo
