On Wednesday 20 August 2014 09:30:37 Knoll Lars wrote:
[snip]
> 1. We don’t remove LGPLv2 for any of the libraries that are part of 5.3.
> 2. We explicitly added GPLv2 to the new libraries to make sure open source
> projects that are using GPLv2 only do not have issues using the new
> libraries.
T
On 20/08/14 11:35, "Florian Weimer" wrote:
>On 08/20/2014 11:30 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>> On 20/08/14 11:16, "Florian Weimer" wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/20/2014 11:02 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>>>
Please have a look at
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/08/20/adding-lgpl-v3-to-qt/ for
details
On 08/20/2014 11:30 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 20/08/14 11:16, "Florian Weimer" wrote:
>
>> On 08/20/2014 11:02 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>>
>>> Please have a look at
>>> http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/08/20/adding-lgpl-v3-to-qt/ for
>>> details.
>>
>> Looking at the Fedora corpus, there are quite
On 20/08/14 11:16, "Florian Weimer" wrote:
>On 08/20/2014 11:02 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>
>> Please have a look at
>> http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/08/20/adding-lgpl-v3-to-qt/ for
>>details.
>
>Looking at the Fedora corpus, there are quite a few programs which link
>against Qt and which are li
On 08/20/2014 11:02 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Please have a look at
> http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/08/20/adding-lgpl-v3-to-qt/ for details.
Looking at the Fedora corpus, there are quite a few programs which link
against Qt and which are licensed under the GPL, version 2, but not any
later v
Hi everybody,
Please have a look at
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/08/20/adding-lgpl-v3-to-qt/ for details.
I’m happy to discuss further here on the mailing list.
Cheers,
Lars
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.q
