half of Thiago
Macieira
Sent: Saturday, 3 February 2024 18:13
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] About the timeline and phases to support C++20 with
and in Qt
On Wednesday, 21 December 2022 09:51:52 PST Vladimir Minenko via Development
wrote:
We got four user stories on Qt
timeline and phases to support C++20 with
and in Qt
On Wednesday, 21 December 2022 09:51:52 PST Vladimir Minenko via Development
wrote:
> We got four user stories on Qt Bug Reports:
>
> 1. Use C++20 code with Qt - https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-109360
> 2. C++20 is required for the de
On 03.02.24 18:13, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 December 2022 09:51:52 PST Vladimir Minenko via Development
> wrote:
>> We got four user stories on Qt Bug Reports:
>>
>> 1. Use C++20 code with Qt - https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-109360
>> 2. C++20 is required for the development
On Wednesday, 21 December 2022 09:51:52 PST Vladimir Minenko via Development
wrote:
> We got four user stories on Qt Bug Reports:
>
> 1. Use C++20 code with Qt - https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-109360
> 2. C++20 is required for the development of Qt itself -
> https://bugreports.qt.io/brows
On Thursday, 4 May 2023 06:48:55 PDT Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote:
> But those that can and do upgrade their toolchain regularly might just as
> well upgrade to something fairly recent whenever they do that. Between 6.8
> branching (the last LTS only requiring C++17, as per current plan)
> On 3 May 2023, at 19:20, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 08:56:07 PDT Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote:
>> However, C++23 adds a bunch of improvements, and perhaps it’s a much smaller
>> challenge for compiler vendors to support after C++20. If we stick to the
>> timelin
Thiago Macieira (3 May 2023 19:20) wrote:
> I don't see us adopting Modules any time soon, not even for the 6.9
> release. It's not well supported *today*.
Also, they're a radical change to how source is organised and it "might
not be a bad idea" to wait until the C++ world has developed some comm
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 08:56:07 PDT Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote:
> The standing proposal is to move to C++20 with Qt 6.9, after the next LTS
> release. I see no pressing reasons to accelerate that. The value of the
> features Thiago listed - which excludes all the big stuff anyway - d
Bumping this thread up in your inboxes as it includes the links to the JIRA
tickets where the journey towards C++20 has been planned and discussed so far.
Let's try to build on what we already know.
The standing proposal is to move to C++20 with Qt 6.9, after the next LTS
release. I see no pres
Hello all,
I want to share on this mailing list a proposal for the timeline and phases to
support C++20 with and in Qt. Writing this, I’m aware that there were other
discussions about the support of C++20 on this mailing list. This message is a
step to get a list of features that all Qt users c
10 matches
Mail list logo
