On Friday 26 February 2016 19:07:53 Nurmi J-P wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> > On 27. jan. 2016, at 09.30, Knoll Lars
> > wrote:
> >
> > If anybody else has a feature he believes absolutely has to make it to
> > 5.7, get it done until Monday or talk to me :)
> I would like to ask for an exception for tex
Ok, go for it.
Cheers,
Lars
On 02/03/16 09:54, "Development on behalf of Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt"
wrote:
>
>
>Den 26.02.2016 20:07, skrev Nurmi J-P:
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>>> On 27. jan. 2016, at 09.30, Knoll Lars wrote:
>>>
>>> If anybody else has a feature he believes absolutely has to make
Den 26.02.2016 20:07, skrev Nurmi J-P:
Hi Lars,
On 27. jan. 2016, at 09.30, Knoll Lars wrote:
If anybody else has a feature he believes absolutely has to make it to 5.7, get
it done until Monday or talk to me :)
I would like to ask for an exception for text selection handles. It's a cruci
Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2016, 19:07:53 CET schrieb Nurmi J-P:
> I would like to ask for an exception for text selection handles. It's a
> crucial feature to make the new editor controls usable on mobile and
> embedded. There's a task for qtquickcontrols2
> (https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-510
Hi Lars,
> On 27. jan. 2016, at 09.30, Knoll Lars wrote:
>
> If anybody else has a feature he believes absolutely has to make it to 5.7,
> get it done until Monday or talk to me :)
I would like to ask for an exception for text selection handles. It's a crucial
feature to make the new editor c
On Monday 01 February 2016 18:53:18 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > What sense does it make to feature-freeze 5.7 before 5.6 is even out yet?
>
> It means we don't delay the release of 5.7 too much even tough 5.6 was
> delayed. 5.7 already contains all the features developed since the 5.6
> feature f
On Montag, 1. Februar 2016 15:26:57 CET Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Knoll Lars wrote:
> > we’re slightly past the originally planned date for the feature freeze,
> > for various reasons (new stuff being open sourced, license change and
> > being late with 5.6). But I believe most things should be in plac
Knoll Lars wrote:
> we’re slightly past the originally planned date for the feature freeze,
> for various reasons (new stuff being open sourced, license change and
> being late with 5.6). But I believe most things should be in place now to
> do the feature freeze for 5.7 next Monday.
What sense do
Lars:
I am sure I am not the only newcomer to QT who would love to add code
to the 5.7 feature list,
but barely have time to contribute bugs to debug 5.6.0 beta let alone
look ahead to 5.7
Now we are faced with waiting until 5.8 to even think about a set of
key missing functions in Qt QML.
I am
Hi everybody,
we’re slightly past the originally planned date for the feature freeze, for
various reasons (new stuff being open sourced, license change and being late
with 5.6). But I believe most things should be in place now to do the feature
freeze for 5.7 next Monday.
There are currently t
10 matches
Mail list logo