On Friday, 30 de December de 2011 13.40.09, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> 2011/12/30 Stephen Kelly :
> > This is due for release in mid-January, so Qt 5.0 could depend on the 16
> > bit API already.
>
> I'd like to bring the discussion we had on IRC yesterday on the
> mailing list. What are the people
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> 2011/12/30 Stephen Kelly :
>> This is due for release in mid-January, so Qt 5.0 could depend on the 16 bit
>> API already.
>
> I'd like to bring the discussion we had on IRC yesterday on the
> mailing list. What are the people's opinions
On Friday 30 December 2011 13:40:09 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> 2011/12/30 Stephen Kelly :
> > This is due for release in mid-January, so Qt 5.0 could depend on the 16
> > bit API already.
>
> I'd like to bring the discussion we had on IRC yesterday on the
> mailing list. What are the people's opin
2011/12/30 Stephen Kelly :
> This is due for release in mid-January, so Qt 5.0 could depend on the 16 bit
> API already.
I'd like to bring the discussion we had on IRC yesterday on the
mailing list. What are the people's opinions about whether it's "good"
(for any value of good) for Qt 5.0 to depe
Just FYI.
This is due for release in mid-January, so Qt 5.0 could depend on the 16 bit
API already.
I'd recommend that the people who know about QRegExp take a look.
Thanks,
Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
> --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>
