On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:15:44PM +0200, Kai Köhne wrote:
> The page is obviously written from the viewpoint of a maintainer. I'd
> prefer to write It in a less intimidating way to the contributor, and
> make it helpful for first time, inexperienced contributors.
>
first-timers can ask in case of
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 11:08 AM
> To: development@qt-project.org; qt-crea...@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] [
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:57:28AM +0200, Martin Smith wrote:
> Sometimes I am listed as a reviewer for a code change in Qt that also involves
> documentation changes. The code change is sometimes outside my expertise, but
> I
> assume I have been included to approve the documentation changes. I a
From: Development on
behalf of Oswald Buddenhagen
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 11:08:07 AM
To: development@qt-project.org; qt-crea...@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] [FYI] commit/review policy refactored
just a heads-up that i (finally) split off the review policy
just a heads-up that i (finally) split off the review policy from the
commit policy. see https://wiki.qt.io/Review_Policy .
if you have suggestions for improvement, please discuss them upfront on
irc.
you're expected to read the document even if you're not interested in
actively improving it any t
