Re: [Development] Alpha 2 this week or skip it

2012-05-31 Thread simo.falt
On 5/31/12 4:25 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: >I'd say that if we have an alpha 2, it's this week. Or we don't release >it at >all and go straight for the beta. > >The current beta snapshot at [1] still has the alpha packaging -- one big >source file. What kind of src packages people are loo

[Development] Qt5 binary packages for testing

2012-05-31 Thread simo.falt
Moi, I made some modifications to binary package publishing scripts. Now it should be easier to file bug reports with correct sha1. All packages, both source and binary installers, are now stored to http://releases.qt-project.org/qt5.0/beta-snapshots/ ( old locations will remain for now) Build

Re: [Development] Qt5 binary installers

2012-05-24 Thread simo.falt
Moi, Installer will ask the target dir while installing. By default is suggesting /home/user/QtSDK. I do imagine that you should be able to install those in parallel. Just make sure that the paths are pointing to correct version while running. Simo On May 24, 2012, at 11:18 AM, ext Daniel Kreut

[Development] Qt5 binary installers

2012-05-23 Thread simo.falt
Hi, Finally there is some progress with the bin packaging. There is now jenkins creating desktop installers twice a day, if there is change in git. Currently it detects the git 7 am and pm (GMT +2). First it creates the beta src package (http://origin.releases.qt-project.org/qt5.0-beta-latest/),

Re: [Development] Qt 4.8.2 Git tag and changes-4.8.2 file

2012-05-22 Thread simo.falt
Qt 4.8.2 will be available trough maintenance tool later. It will most likely be released with Qt SDK 1.2.2 update. Currently we are waiting for the final fixes for the mobile targets. Simo From: development-bounces+simo.falt=nokia@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.0 alpha released

2012-04-05 Thread simo.falt
From: development-bounces+simo.falt=nokia@qt-project.org [development-bounces+simo.falt=nokia@qt-project.org] on behalf of ext Thiago Macieira [thiago.macie...@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 5:49 PM To: development@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.0 alpha released

2012-04-04 Thread simo.falt
Moi, I can't provide you an easy way but I can show you a way to get the alpha out of git (see below). But yes, it is true that there isn't any tag in git but I hope we will fix that in future releases. There was quite a lot of last minute hassle while creating that, so it ended up to be this way.

Re: [Development] Compiling Qt5 Alpha on Linux fails

2012-04-04 Thread simo.falt
Hi, Is there a reason why you are trying to build it without prefix? If you do the build in your home dir with "-prefix $PWD/qtbase" in your configure, you shouldn't need the sudo. Also if you really do have older qt in your path, please remove it and add $PWD/qtbase/bin in it instead. Simo On 4

Re: [Development] Qt 5 alpha approaching

2012-03-06 Thread simo.falt
, like generating the docs and removing test sources, but otherwise it is getting there. Simo -Original Message- From: releasing-bounces+simo.falt=nokia@qt-project.org [mailto:releasing-bounces+simo.falt=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP/Oslo) Sent: 6

Re: [Development] Qt 4.8.1 release during week 11/2012

2012-03-06 Thread simo.falt
On 3/5/12 6:21 PM, "ext Oswald Buddenhagen" wrote: >On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 03:24:04PM +, ext Salovaara Akseli wrote: >> At the moment we are following content of >> http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/commits/4.8 branch on our internal >> repository. We would like to provide Qt 4.8.1 branch on >

Re: [Development] Schedule for Qt 4.8.1

2012-02-14 Thread simo.falt
On 2/14/12 12:45 PM, "ext Olivier Goffart" wrote: >2) Will there be a release branch, like there was with previous version >of Qt? >(Which let a bit of time to stabilize the actual release by cherry-picking >only showstopper) >There was none with Qt 4.8.0, why? Can't comment to the future of the

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-06 Thread simo.falt
On 2/5/12 4:12 PM, "ext lars.kn...@nokia.com" wrote: >We also need to now create a team that focuses on creating packages out of >our source code that we can then release. For the Alpha I propose that we >only do source packages (great if we get binaries though), we will however >need to prepar