Re: [Development] How to run Qt's auto-tests?

2013-05-28 Thread shane.kearns
> What's the procedure for building and running Qt's auto-tests? I've > tried: > See Sergio's response. Note that 'make check' will stop at the first failure, and the QtNetwork tests require a test server to be set up. See here: https://qt.gitorious.org/qtqa/sysadmin/blobs/master/README.network_t

Re: [Development] QNetworkRequest: allow overriding connect host

2013-05-10 Thread shane.kearns
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Justin Karneges > Sent: 10 May 2013 00:44 > To: development@qt-project.org >

Re: [Development] QNetworkRequest: allow overriding connect host

2013-05-10 Thread shane.kearns
> QHostInfo has a short-lived cache, so it should work. Yes, but relying on implementation details isn't a good idea. I thought the proposed feature could be more generally useful, for example using test live servers that are configured exactly as the live server so they have a DNS address not

Re: [Development] Network test server for Ubuntu 12.04 x64 available for Puppet - test version

2013-04-24 Thread shane.kearns
e the move from Nokia to Digia, so some of the failures may be due to this pre-existing problem. -- From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Sarajärvi Tony Sent: 24 April 2013 13:33 To: d

Re: [Development] Setting a Minimum Support OpenSSL Version

2013-04-17 Thread shane.kearns
> 1) We could say we'll set the minimum to the version macos bundles. If we don't support it, then people will need to include openssl with their application on Mac OS, in the same way they do on Windows. My (weak) understanding of Mac packaging is that the libraries should ideally be included i

Re: [Development] Setting a Minimum Support OpenSSL Version

2013-04-17 Thread shane.kearns
On the topic of linux distribution provided versions Ubuntu 10.04 LTS has 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8, updatable to 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.13 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS has 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.8 (I don't know the original release in the iso, but it was 1.0.x) This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain pri

Re: [Development] Status of QTimeZone

2013-03-26 Thread shane.kearns
> > It fails for me, too; the tests are off by 1 hour, it seems. > > This is indeed a mystery. Is the CI in a "European" timezone? > > > > the CI log shows: > > -- > Testing tst_QDateTime > Totals: 350 passed, 0 failed, 34 skipped > -

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-01-23 Thread shane.kearns
> > Where is the read only cts property with a ctsChanged signal to > monitor the input pin? > > Nowhere. Again, there is a impossible have a cross-platform > capabilities to notify about change of CTS pins. > In principle, this feature is available only for Windows, but POSIX > does not provide t

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-01-23 Thread shane.kearns
>As I repeated the above, it can not be done, at least cross-platform. >On Windows there is a possibility, but not the fact that it is implemented >correctly. OK, that is a good reason to not include it. >>The UART has four control lines: RTS/CTS and DTR/DSR, two inputs and two >>outputs. >> >

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-01-23 Thread shane.kearns
level. I think the input signals and output signals need to be separated in the API. For the rate property, what was the reason not to name it baudRate? That's probably a familiar term to people working with serial ports. -- From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-projec

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Preparing Qt 5.0.1 release

2013-01-11 Thread shane.kearns
> Hi, > > All the repos part of the Qt 5.0.1 release were merged yesterday from > stable->release as announced. > > So changes for 5.0.1 need to be pushed to 'refs/for/release' with a > Task-number tag in the commit message pointing to a P0/P1 task [1]. > > The process should be that you get the ch

Re: [Development] dist/changes-x.y.z (was: Re: Branches)

2012-12-06 Thread shane.kearns
> If we're successful, this will be a non-issue once a few dozen entries > have been added (unless everyone tries to append instead of inserting > entries in some sorted order). If you sort by bug ID, the recently reported bugs will be appended at the end. So staging conflicts happen mostly for th

Re: [Development] dist/changes-x.y.z (was: Re: Branches)

2012-12-06 Thread shane.kearns
> Hi Lars, > > On Monday December 3 2012, Knoll Lars wrote: > > Dev: > > > > Dev is the branch where you can land anything that's supposed to go > > into 5.1. The following policies apply: > > > > * Changes have to be source and binary compatible > > * You can add new method and classes given that

Re: [Development] Proposal: New list of Qt 5 reference / Tier 1 platforms

2012-11-14 Thread shane.kearns
> There haven't been too much discussion about different Linux > configurations, But as you can see from list of currently CI tested > configurations there are quite many of them. Personally I'm thinking > that we should remove Ubuntu > 10.04 or at least reduce the number of tested configurations f

Re: [Development] Proposal: New list of Qt 5 reference / Tier 1 platforms

2012-11-13 Thread shane.kearns
> Win8 support would be nice to add, but please do not drop WinXP. > MS may be dropping official, public support for WinXP in 2014; but it will > still be around for a very long time. > Ben Are you referring to XP for embedded? (which survives until 2016) I'd strongly advise anyone not to use a

Re: [Development] QT5 Beta 1 & Android

2012-11-12 Thread shane.kearns
On Android it is possible to handle display orientation by yourself, not using the default behaviour of destroying and recreating the UI. You'd use OrientationEventListener & Display classes to detect the orientation then. This would make sense for a QML application where the scene graph can hand

Re: [Development] Common base class for all socket types

2012-11-08 Thread shane.kearns
> There is a ton of overlap between QIODevice and QAbstractSocket, but > don't think too hard about it or else you'll drive yourself mad. QIODevice is actually a superclass of QAbstractSocket. > The most common functionality that is shared between QAbstractSocket > and QLocalSocket is just the co

Re: [Development] Dependencies of Qt5

2012-10-30 Thread shane.kearns
> This time we will need RUBY. What next? Webkit also requires bison. -- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.

Re: [Development] Cleanup of QCoreApplication::watchUnixSignal

2012-10-25 Thread shane.kearns
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Rafael Roquetto > Sent: 25 October 2012 15:17 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject:

[Development] Proposal: installation of QtWebkit helper processes

2012-10-22 Thread shane.kearns
Background: QtWebkit in Qt 5 requires two helper processes: QtWebProcess & QtWebPluginProcess Applications using a web view component will not work if these executables are not in the path. These processes are an implementation detail of Webkit, and the interfaces may not be compatible between

Re: [Development] QtNetwork: using system proxy by default

2012-10-16 Thread shane.kearns
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: 15 October 2012 18:41 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subj

Re: [Development] QtNetwork: using system proxy by default

2012-10-15 Thread shane.kearns
Apparently not, I don't know why Microsoft implemented it this way. The result is only cached if a PAC script is successfully downloaded. The DHCP method doesn't serve the PAC url together with the IP address, it's a separate query sent to the DHCP server by the browser (or us) If autodetection

Re: [Development] QtNetwork: using system proxy by default

2012-10-11 Thread shane.kearns
> IMHO #4 gives the best out-of-the-box experience. > > Is there a way to do the blocking winapi call in a thread on app start- > up maybe? Doesn't help if the first thing an application wants to do is download something from the network. It would only help because of the workaround we already ha

Re: [Development] QtNetwork: using system proxy by default

2012-10-11 Thread shane.kearns
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Peter Hartmann > Sent: 11 October 2012 14:12 > To: development@qt-project.org >

Re: [Development] Co-installation & executable naming rules

2012-10-08 Thread shane.kearns
> We just had a discussion in the Oslo office about this. We suggest to > basically follow your proposal, with an addon to hide some of the > uglyness it brings along. > > Let me try to summarize very shortly. The base proposal would be to > include the major Qt version throughout the project: > >

Re: [Development] How to release critical fixes?

2012-10-05 Thread shane.kearns
: O | O-v4.8.3 |\ O O | | O O-v4.8.4 | ... | O-v4.8.5 -- > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Rafael Roquetto > Sent: 05 October

Re: [Development] Preparing to release repackaged version of Qt 4.8.3 with Digia copyrights

2012-10-04 Thread shane.kearns
> I see three critical things which must be released asap: > > 1. the (C) headers change > 2. MingW patch. > 3. d41dc3e101a694dec98d7bbb582d428d209e5401 - this is the SSL > workaround from Robin. > (Rich, not Robin) If the release is called 4.8.4, then the SSL security patch must be included, as

Re: [Development] Extending Visual Studio's display of Qt classes

2012-09-17 Thread shane.kearns
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Tom Isaacson > Sent: 16 September 2012 11:08 > To: development@qt-project.org >

Re: [Development] Git commit hook keywords

2012-09-17 Thread shane.kearns
The line: Change-Id: I9c239ff790a139c7820ef1aeced89d31320ae6b0 Is what identifies the code review. If you put that into the search box on gerrit, it gives the url: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,I9c239ff790a139c7820ef1aeced89d31320ae6b0,n,z Which shows the two reviews for this change (5.0 a

Re: [Development] Experimental Qt 5 installers by Digia

2012-07-31 Thread shane.kearns
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Olivier Goffart > Sent: 31 July 2012 08:54 > To: development@qt-project.org > Cc: Thiago M

Re: [Development] Cherry pick fix from Qt5 to Qt 4.8.x

2012-07-27 Thread shane.kearns
og --author= origin/master" "git log --grep= origin/master" Create a patch file "git format-patch -1 " Go to your qt4 clone and apply the patch "git am -3 " If the patch does not apply, you can edit it (e.g. change the paths for autotests before applying

Re: [Development] Use static qt libraries

2012-07-24 Thread shane.kearns
> On terça-feira, 24 de julho de 2012 15.17.23, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Here we have a big problem. QNetworkConfigurationPrivate is not > > exported, so it can't be used from the plugins. It should be > exported > > and its virtual destructor should be de-inlined. > > Actually, since the class

Re: [Development] Use static qt libraries

2012-07-24 Thread shane.kearns
> > Thanks, are such undefined symbols normal ? And is there a way to fix > it ? > > Missing only the _ZTI ones is highly irregular. The typeinfo objects > are always emitted together with the virtual table and other objects. > Since the virtual tables are not missing, the only explanation I can >

Re: [Development] QHttpResponseHeader is obsolete and removed from Qt5

2012-07-06 Thread shane.kearns
: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Leandro Melo de Sales Sent: 06 July 2012 05:21 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] QHttpResponseHeader is obsolete and removed from Qt5 Hi

Re: [Development] Qt5 beta, MinGW: undefined reference to `WinMain@16'

2012-07-05 Thread shane.kearns
Does the same problem happen if using qmake instead of qbs? There is a qtmain.lib static library that should be added automatically to windows executables, which provides the WinMain entry point. -- From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces

Re: [Development] Proposal: Remove QML from Qt's code base (OR: Should it be a requirement that Qt Modules are interoperable?)

2012-07-04 Thread shane.kearns
> > So that is possible. > > QtQuick3D for example just does: > > "QT = core gui qml quick 3d" > > > > and there is no check anywhere in that repo that checks if QML should > be built, so you get an error about missing qml and quick modules. > > > > I wouldn't mind fixing it, but I just missed how

Re: [Development] Notes from QtNetwork sessions

2012-06-26 Thread shane.kearns
> > * Autotests > > * Non-significant > > * Not compiled > > What is meant by "not compiled"? Tests excluded from the parent .pro file (qnetworkproxyfactory used to be commented out, this has been fixed in 5.0 but not 4.8) Also use of contains(QT_CONFIG, private_tests) to exclude test cases

Re: [Development] 'Last week in Qt development' blogs

2012-06-25 Thread shane.kearns
> Someone mentioned at the Qt CS that they'd like to see some weekly > digest of developments in Qt. For those unaware (at least someone at Qt > CS was unaware), I'm providing that on the KDAB blog: > > http://www.kdab.com/category/qtdevelopment/ > > (I'm aware that the content is not currently sor

Re: [Development] Notes from QtNetwork sessions

2012-06-25 Thread shane.kearns
> > Multihoming is actually quite common if you consider VPNs. > > (e.g. intranet traffic goes to the VPN, and everything else goes to > > the real network adaptor by default) > > When I think "multihoming", I think different routes to reach the same > server. > Usually, that means two default rout

Re: [Development] Notes from QtNetwork sessions

2012-06-25 Thread shane.kearns
From: Xizhi Zhu [mailto:xizhi@gmail.com] > Do we have the mutex / blocking issues for the bearer tracked on Jira? I > guess it needs some design, > including the blocking constructor, before we really start to fix it. There have been a number of issues in JIRA, most have been P1 emergencies f

[Development] Notes from QtNetwork sessions

2012-06-25 Thread shane.kearns
Thanks due to Rich Moore for taking notes in the session, which I've edited my own into. * Built-in support for redirects (suggested by Yuval T.) * Flag on QNAM * Override on a per-request basis? * Set max count? (for avoiding redirect loops) * What about redirect from secure to non-secu

Re: [Development] qtdeclarative CI

2012-06-18 Thread shane.kearns
inter calls to d_func() on ARM - 0x8 could be the same thing on x64) -- > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Girish Ramakrishnan > Sent

Re: [Development] Can't switch submodules to master and Mac build still broken

2012-06-18 Thread shane.kearns
; In case the script relies on this behaviour. (above configuration was in the gerrit setup wiki page) -- > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Beh

Re: [Development] Build error in bluetooth module on Mac OS X 10.6

2012-06-15 Thread shane.kearns
> > Proposed real fix is here: > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,28604 > > > > I see that the change has been merged. How long will it be before it > can be pulled from git? I can see it in qtbase master branch but not > yet in > qt5 pull. > These should be the same thing, have you trie

[Development] Proposed API addition to QTcpServer

2012-06-13 Thread shane.kearns
Background: If accept() returns an error, QTcpServer may live lock. (QTBUG-24778) The problem as described is that accept() returns EMFILE when quota is reached. On returning to the event loop, select() triggers again because the incoming connection is still pending This prevents other sockets bei

Re: [Development] Another late API addition in QScreen

2012-06-06 Thread shane.kearns
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Samuel Rødal > Sent: 05 June 2012 13:30 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Deve

Re: [Development] About the QtDir::currentPath

2012-06-01 Thread shane.kearns
end to use unix style paths everywhere though -- > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of song.7@nokia.com > Sent: 01 June 2012 0

Re: [Development] JIRA changes

2012-05-29 Thread shane.kearns
[snip] > This builds a progressive enablement of system access. > Anonymous - can see issues > Users (Contributors) - can raise and comment on issues, see linked > source code through Fisheye plugin and be assigned issues Current > Assignee - can edit issues and progress them through the workflow >

Re: [Development] Approver status

2012-05-28 Thread shane.kearns
I'm as interested to see insightful review comments as a bulk of contribution. Put another way, anyone can press the +1 button. The comments that go with a -1 inform how good a reviewer somebody is. -- Subject to local law, communications with Accenture and its a

Re: [Development] Qt5 binary installers

2012-05-28 Thread shane.kearns
ever it is unintentionally hitting the Qt plugin DLLs as well. -- > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of qtnext > Sent: 25 May 2012 1

Re: [Development] NOTE: Gerrit / Codereview upgrade - Service unavailable Thursday May 24, 09:00 - 09:30 CEST

2012-05-24 Thread shane.kearns
Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Carl Schumann > Sent: 24 May 2012 13:51 > To: Matias Rand; development@qt-project.org > Cc: Denise S. Finstr

Re: [Development] QUrl fully-decoded path API

2012-05-17 Thread shane.kearns
; From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: 14 May 2012 17:29 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] QUrl fully-decoded path API &g

Re: [Development] Build failed use MinGW-TDM or MinGW-w64 on Windows

2012-05-15 Thread shane.kearns
ed in the alpha release notes (not sure how many of those issues are solved since then) -- From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Loaden Sent: 15 May 2012 09:21 To: development Subjec

Re: [Development] #qt-labs IRC channel on irc.freenode.net

2012-05-14 Thread shane.kearns
> -Original Message- > On Behalf Of André Somers > Sent: 14 May 2012 16:29 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] #qt-labs IRC channel on irc.freenode.net > > Op 14-5-2012 17:26, Carl Schumann schreef: > > Qt developers, > > > > I am struggling to access the #qt-labs

Re: [Development] unity3d plugin in QML webview

2012-05-14 Thread shane.kearns
more details, but it should be possible to find out how that was solved by looking at the sources and commit logs) I'd suspect the plugin is calling functions which are stubbed or return incorrect values for the QGraphicsWebView implementation. -- From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accent

Re: [Development] Enable Exceptions for Windows CE as default

2012-05-11 Thread shane.kearns
> -Original Message- > From: Olivier Goffart [mailto:oliv...@woboq.com] > Sent: 11 May 2012 12:53 > To: Kearns, Shane > Cc: lars.kn...@nokia.com; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Enable Exceptions for Windows CE as default > > On Friday 11 May 2012 11:01:38 shane.kea.

Re: [Development] Enable Exceptions for Windows CE as default

2012-05-11 Thread shane.kearns
intermediate stack objects of the Qt code not having been cleaned up. -- > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of lars.kn...@nokia.com > Se

Re: [Development] Which "Target Repository" to use for a Merge Request?

2012-05-10 Thread shane.kearns
https://bugreports.qt-project.org is correct for bugs in Qt. The link you followed is for reporting bugs on the codereview tool itself. -- > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=

Re: [Development] Which "Target Repository" to use for a Merge Request?

2012-05-10 Thread shane.kearns
http://wiki.qt-project.org/Gerrit_Introduction -- > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Carl Schumann > Sent: 10 May 2012 13:49

Re: [Development] Bugreports for Playground projects

2012-05-02 Thread shane.kearns
This sounds like something we should have. e.g. QTPLAYGROUND as the project (instead of QTBUG) and one or more components for each playground project. Does anyone from the JIRA experts group have a comment? -- > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=acc

[Development] API review - proposed renaming of QAbstractSocket::PauseOnNotify to PauseOnSslErrors

2012-04-30 Thread shane.kearns
https://codereview.qt-project.org/24905 Although we created an enum for pause modes to make 5.x binary compatible with 5.0, the enum value is not well named. In 5.1, we propose to add PauseOnProxyAuthentication to the enum. PauseOnNotify is not clear what it means, while PauseOnSslErrors is. Any

Re: [Development] Where is the QtLocation history?

2012-04-27 Thread shane.kearns
Not sure if it's what you're looking for, but some old history is in git://qt.gitorious.org/qt-mobility/qt-mobility.git in src/location. -- From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] On

[Development] Qt addons in gerrit - separate namespace or not?

2012-04-17 Thread shane.kearns
Simple question, do we want the qt/ namespace to be for essentials only, or also for addons. e.g. should the path to an addon be: ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtftp or ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qtaddon/qtftp There are currently addons in qt/ and qt-labs/ but these were cre

Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta

2012-04-13 Thread shane.kearns
> Random question of the day: do you happen to have stats about how often > those insignificant tests actually fail? That should help to figure out > which ones are actually working, and therefore should not be marked as > insignificant. > > -- > Giuseppe D'Angelo The CI logs are publicly availabl

Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta

2012-04-13 Thread shane.kearns
Another way tests have been disabled is using CONFIG += no_check_target which seems to have been done when tests were initially disabled before the insignificant_test option was added. e.g. auto.pro has this: # disable 'make check' on Mac OS X for the following subdirs for the time being mac {

Re: [Development] Qftp removal

2012-04-11 Thread shane.kearns
> Go for option 1. > > It's not any more effort than the others, unless we decided to build > one single library (which isn't what you said). Agreed. Based on the guidelines in http://wiki.qt-project.org/Creating_a_new_module_or_tool_for_Qt We should have two Qt addon projects created in gerrit:

Re: [Development] Qftp removal

2012-04-03 Thread shane.kearns
ounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen > Sent: 29 March 2012 16:48 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qftp removal > > On Thu, Mar 2

Re: [Development] Qftp removal

2012-03-29 Thread shane.kearns
we've created projects with pre-existing git history before, when importing the Qt5 modules to gerrit. > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] &g

Re: [Development] Qftp removal

2012-03-28 Thread shane.kearns
e: > > >Can we get an addon module (project in gerrit) for putting standalone > >implementations of these removed features? > >I wouldn't expect a huge amount of commits, but the code (and > >associated > >examples/tests) needs to be moved there and converted from

Re: [Development] Why we need some CMake file of Build Or Install Qt?

2012-03-22 Thread shane.kearns
tests" Alpha package was unzipped to c:\dev\qt\qt-everywhere... From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Kelly Sent: 22 March 2012 10:15 To: development@qt-project.org S

Re: [Development] Three issue about Qt5 alpha

2012-03-20 Thread shane.kearns
t, where alpha issues are being discussed. From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Loaden Sent: 20 March 2012 03:58 To: development@qt-project.org; qt-crea...@qt-project.org Subject: [Devel

Re: [Development] The qtbase CI should run the qtdeclarative tests

2012-03-19 Thread shane.kearns
> For http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,19591 I requested at test, > but apparently there's some IPv4 vs 6 special configuration needed for > it to make sense. I don't know why the test can't be in qtbase; the > TestHTTPServer that was crashing in qtdeclarative is running on the > local host

Re: [Development] Qt Playground - Command Line Parser experiment

2012-03-15 Thread shane.kearns
ont like perl's GetOpt::Long) Allow opt out from short argument compression (i.e. "/xzf" would only be considered as a synonym for "--xzf" and not for "-x -z -f" if the opt out is applied) > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.ke

Re: [Development] Windows: Qt5 does not run the application in release mode.

2012-03-14 Thread shane.kearns
release” From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Denis Shienkov Sent: 13 March 2012 19:16 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Windows: Qt5 does not run the application in

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 4.8.1 open source release date approaching..

2012-03-12 Thread shane.kearns
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:16:24PM +, ext > shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote: > > > > (rc1)-o-o-o-o-o-o-fix-o-o-o-o-o-o-fix > > \ > > fix(rc2)-fix(v4.8.1) > > > this is no option, because it "loses" the tag from the history. > "traditionally" we have merged back the release branch

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 4.8.1 open source release date approaching..

2012-03-09 Thread shane.kearns
> This was discussed earlier, and we were thinking about using a branch. > It > was decided that we will try without. The basic idea is that at any > time > the code should be good to use. Naturally it is not always so, thus we > may > need to take another try. > > We have nothing against using a b

Re: [Development] where can I get the lastest source code?

2012-03-09 Thread shane.kearns
> > now the Qt4 version is not developed? > > and I only get the lastest version from > git://gitorious.org/qt/qtbase.git ?? > The Qt4 repository is still at git://gitorious.org/qt/qt.git Bug fixes can still go there for 4.8.x patch releases. The modular repositories (e.g. qtbase) are only for Qt5

Re: [Development] (long) thoughts on categorized logging (qLog)

2012-02-24 Thread shane.kearns
> Home path might not be the best as it could intermingle with other > files that belong to the user. > > On *nix, QDir::homePath() that would be /home/ and users see > that directory a lot, and it will get intermixed with other files. > On Windows, most users have no clue about %userprofile%, so i

Re: [Development] (long) thoughts on categorized logging (qLog)

2012-02-24 Thread shane.kearns
> > well, it probably shouldn't be in CWD regardless of platform. Agreed, unless you're specifying the log file via a command line parameter > > > On Windows, I'd suggest %APPDATA%\ or at minimum > %APPDATA%. > You might even get away with using %TEMP%; but it'd be harder to find > the log then.

Re: [Development] Default enabling inbound flow control on sockets

2012-02-14 Thread shane.kearns
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: 13 February 2012 19:27 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subj

Re: [Development] Changes to the Jira roles and workflow

2012-02-13 Thread shane.kearns
ty. > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Alan Alpert > Sent: 09 February 2012 22:26 > To: development@qt-project.org > Cc: j...@qt-project.or

Re: [Development] Default enabling inbound flow control on sockets

2012-02-13 Thread shane.kearns
> > Not sure. Is it a big problem? Or is it better to just continue as is, > and let the applications that do have a problem set it to something > reasonable to them instead? > > I'd probably suggest that we instead improve the output on that worst > case failure to help devs fix the problems in th

Re: [Development] Default enabling inbound flow control on sockets

2012-02-13 Thread shane.kearns
You've correctly understood the problem, but the scale is less bad (takes a couple of minutes to exhaust 2GB limit of a 32 bit process using a loopback connection) Changing the default would mean behavior is the same as if you called setReadBufferSize(65536) in the application. Currently the de

[Development] Default enabling inbound flow control on sockets

2012-02-10 Thread shane.kearns
The current default behaviour of Qt sockets is that they allocate an unbounded amount of memory if the application is not reading all data from the socket but the event loop is running. In the worst case, this causes memory allocation failure resulting in a crash or app exit due to bad_alloc exc

Re: [Development] Changes to the Jira roles and workflow

2012-02-09 Thread shane.kearns
It's easy to make a report on your personal dashboard to show issues reported on a given (set of) component(s). It means polling rather than email notification, but the email notifications have poor signal:noise ratio. > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+s

Re: [Development] Feature freeze and Alpha

2012-02-07 Thread shane.kearns
n opt-out), then we would be source incompatible. > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Jonas M. Gastal > Sent: Monday, Feb

Re: [Development] QLog ( Work on qDebug and friends)

2012-02-02 Thread shane.kearns
An important requirement is that it must be easy to enable debugging in Qt libraries without touching the application code. This is so that we can debug regressions affecting closed source applications. With the existing qDebug, we need to disable the qInstallMsgHandler call*, and recompile the

Re: [Development] Compatability break in QUrl in Qt 4.8

2012-01-31 Thread shane.kearns
> Fair enough. > > Other opinions around? Olivier has already said he's for reverting to > the old > 4.7 behaviour. > The documentation note about the dangers of constructing QUrl from QString was already there in 4.6 (at the bottom of the page) However, QT_NO_URL_CAST_FROM_STRING is not defined b

Re: [Development] Removing QContactThumbnail class from QtContacts API

2012-01-31 Thread shane.kearns
show up in the address book. While you could store some kind of link to the photo album, this isn't likely to be a simple file: url. From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] On Beha

Re: [Development] QLog ( Work on qDebug and friends)

2012-01-31 Thread shane.kearns
> > +1 from me > > - Crazy idea : allow logging to a socket ? ( remote log/debug ) > - More than one logging file ? One file for every category / group of > categories > - Log File rotation > > Just my 2 cents. > Not that crazy an idea - I normally use USB to catch the live debug log from phones.

Re: [Development] Problem with pushing my changes

2012-01-30 Thread shane.kearns
wise a lot of people will never see your messages due to junk email filters. From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Ramamurthy K V Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 05:05 To:

Re: [Development] Tests, Shadow-Build and Cross-Compilation

2012-01-30 Thread shane.kearns
elopment-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Holger Hans Peter Freyther > Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 20:13 > To: development > Subject: [Development] Tests, Shadow-Build and Cross-Compil

Re: [Development] proposing "removed apis" playground project

2012-01-24 Thread shane.kearns
submit a patch to add them to the "removed apis" repository further patches may be required to compile, for example if the class depends on private headers or non exported classes QFtp was easy to move, QHttp was harder (due to usage of QAuthenticatorPrivate) From: development-bounces+sh

[Development] proposing "removed apis" playground project

2012-01-24 Thread shane.kearns
This project is to host the source code of APIs which have been removed in Qt5, where the replacement does not cover all features. Initially it will be used for static library versions of QFtp and QHttp. As previously discussed on this mailing list, some applications depend on features of these c

Re: [Development] Legacy "trolltech" strings

2012-01-19 Thread shane.kearns
org.qt-project sounds like the right default to me, for places where a reverse domain is used. The Nokia maps location plugin should probably still be com.nokia though. > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:de

Re: [Development] QRegularExpression -- first round of API review

2012-01-17 Thread shane.kearns
> > 3) Need a couple of better names for partial matching: > - partial match preferring a complete match > - partial match returning whatever match (partial or complete) is found > first > > PCRE uses Soft and Hard respectively (which are quite meaningless to > me). PreferCompleteMatch / PreferFir

Re: [Development] Qftp removal

2012-01-16 Thread shane.kearns
QFtp, QHttp are ported as standalone classes in a kitchen sink repo on my hard drive. Once there is a project on gerrit, I can push it for code review. > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+sha

Re: [Development] Qftp removal

2012-01-11 Thread shane.kearns
> > I'd say we should keep each independent class in its own static library > build. > So it would be "qftp" inside a kitchen sink repository. > I agree completely Subject to local law, communications with Accenture and its affiliates including telephone calls an

Re: [Development] Qftp removal

2012-01-11 Thread shane.kearns
ndalone > >implementations of these removed features? > >I wouldn't expect a huge amount of commits, but the code (and > associated > >examples/tests) needs to be moved there and converted from dll exports > to > >static libraries. > > > >> -Original Mess

Re: [Development] Qftp removal

2012-01-11 Thread shane.kearns
Original Message- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of lars.kn...@nokia.com > Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 10:18 > To: thiago.macie...@intel.com; dev

  1   2   >