[Development] 6.2.4 problems ?

2022-03-03 Thread qt . dantec
Le Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:08:30 -0800, Thiago Macieira écrivait: >After 6.2.4, the 6.2 branch becomes irrelevant for me, so I don't care what >you do. Coming back after a long interruption (cancer, chemo etc.). That kind of message is quite worrisome, particularly when made by Thiago. What happ

Re: [Development] Did we have to remove cmake's qt5_use_modules?

2018-06-08 Thread qt . dantec
Le Wed, 06 Jun 2018 23:03:40 -0700, Thiago Macieira écrivait: >But it appears that in the 5 years since we deprecated it, people have not >stopped using it. Did we have to remove it? Or should we have kept >compatibility until Qt 6? The Qt promise is to maintain not only source code, but upwa

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.0

2012-12-21 Thread qt . dantec
Le Fri, 21 Dec 2012 23:28:20 +0100, qt.dan...@free.fr écrivait: >Unfortunately, the video seems no longer to be available. False alert : Now works again. Sorry for the noise. Quentin. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lis

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.0

2012-12-21 Thread qt . dantec
Le Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:07:29 +, List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development écrivait: >Also enjoy our nice launch video at http://youtu.be/FIs5YqzS4Bc Unfortunately, the video seems no longer to be available. Quentin ___ Developm

Re: [Development] Community effort in updating Qt5 docs -- QThread focus

2012-09-29 Thread qt . dantec
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:59:29 +0800, Sze Howe Koh wrote: >If you could spare a few >minutes to read it and provide comments, either on the forum of this >mailing list, I would be very grateful. Since it is QT5 docs, you might want to encourage using the new QT5 syntax for connecting objects, whi