On 20/04/12 6:20 AM, "ext André Pönitz"
wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:05:32AM +, michael.godd...@nokia.com wrote:
>> I'd like to nominate Mithra Pattison for approver, based on his work
>> over the past few months with QtMultimedia.
>
>I wonder whether nominations should generally be a l
I'd like to nominate Mithra Pattison for approver, based on his work over
the past few months with QtMultimedia.
Cheers,
MichaelG
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Thirded!
Cheers,
MichaelG
On 6/03/12 6:45 AM, "ext Robin Burchell" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'd like to nominate Mark Brand (mabrand) for approver status. He has
>been around Qt for quite a long while - pre-opengov - and steadily
>chipping away at making QtSql more awesome.
>
>You can see some of his tra
Howdy,
>Assigning new tasks "unassigned" will not notify the maintainer about
>issues in the modules that have come up, and the maintainer will not by
>notified when someone takes a task and starts working on it.
Surely this is something that JIRA could support? Watching a component or
similar?
Hello,
On 20/01/12 11:53 PM, "ext Laszlo Papp" wrote:
>> Hoe about QtAudio3D then?
>
>I am not familiar with Qt module naming conventions, but I think it is
>better than Qt3DAudio (ie. 3D would be more logical at the end of the
>module name) since:
>
>a) It is less likely to confuse someone into
Hello,
> QMessageLogger(__FILE__, __LINE__, Q_FUNC_INFO):debug("Hello World")
Yay, I don't have to do that any more :) Although now I'll have to remove
the existing ones..
>The patch is almost ready to go in ... Anyhow, the question is whether
>there's additional things we need to have in QtC
Hi Laszlo,
On 19/01/12 6:37 PM, "ext Laszlo Papp" wrote:
>> Sorry about the delay - there has been no progress that I've seen. I
>> repinged again recently but will do again.
>
>Would it be the best to call instead ?
Perhaps yes. I have received some initial guidance from Cristy - QtOpenAL
its
Hi Laszlo,
On 9/01/12 4:52 PM, "ext Laszlo Papp" wrote:
>>>The module name would be either QtOpenAL or 3D Audio. Either one works
>>>for me.
>>
>> I'd prefer QtOpenAL because there are other 3D audio systems (if less
>> popular), but there may be a trademark issue. I've asked Cristy about
>> th
Hello,
On 14/12/11 8:53 AM, "ext Laszlo Papp" wrote:
>I would like to work on a 3D Audio module in Qt Playground [1] that might
>be
>beneficial later for projects, like Qt3D, game engines, development
>platforms,
>or games without a platform underneath. Surprisingly enough, certain media
>player
