Re: [Development] Nominating Marc Mutz for approver status

Normal procedure has been that an issue gets raised in Jira, and Mark usually takes care of it. -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 9/6/12 15:02 Ahumada Sergio (Nokia-MP/Oslo) wrote: On 09/05/2012 07:14 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 5 de setembro de 2012 18.53.24, Sergio Ahumada wrote

Re: [Development] Removing Wacom support in Qt5

On 9/6/12 8:48 AM, "ext Boudewijn Rempt" wrote: >On Thursday 06 September 2012 Sep, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: >> We only had one guy working on it, and he was primarily on OSX. He >>hadn't work for us for years now, hence why these bugs have been piling >>up. >> >> I think it shouldn't

Re: [Development] Removing Wacom support in Qt5

We only had one guy working on it, and he was primarily on OSX. He hadn't work for us for years now, hence why these bugs have been piling up. I think it shouldn't take much for someone who cares and have the HW to get it back up to scratch. -- Sent from my Nokia N9On 9/5/12 20:25 ext Ariel Mol

Re: [Development] Playground project request

My initial thoughts are "why not!", but can you adhere to the Qt Project's CLA as this is part of you PhD? The CLA is in place to both protect users of the code, but also to allow relicensing of the code so it's usable in commercial projects, where GPL or LGPL code would not work. I suggest yo

Re: [Development] Qt 5 beta

On 31/08/2012 07:29, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 13.08.39, Laszlo Papp wrote: >> First: no, that is not true. We will store the upstream tarball as bz2 on >> the Community OBS anyway due to the debian tools and technology on the >> community OBS what we have. >

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

On 8/30/12 6:16 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On quinta-feira, 30 de agosto de 2012 17.25.24, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: >> There are more differences than that. There are differences in >> features, such as threading support, large-file support, etc. >> Mingw-w64 is usually ahead of any other

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

Rubens release is currently broken, and there shouldn't be a need for a separate package for 32bit vs 64bit really. -- .marius On 30/08/2012 10:05, ext Loaden wrote: > I want to say, mingw-w64 is the best choice. > I am using ruben's personally build to compilation Qt5/QtCreator on both > Windo

Re: [Development] tools/configure with mingw build error

On 28/08/2012 13:46, ext Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 28.08.2012 19:59, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: >> On 28/08/2012 12:48, ext Peter Kümmel wrote: >>> But also jom fails, I thought jom could also handle mingw >>> makefiles? >> >> No, Jom only handles NMake makefiles, afaik. > > Checked it agai

Re: [Development] tools/configure with mingw build error

On 28/08/2012 12:48, ext Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 28.08.2012 19:27, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: >> On 28/08/2012 12:16, ext Peter Kümmel wrote: >>> Have I missed something or is building with mingw in cmd.exe not supported? >> >> This is not your fault, it's the rubenvb release which is bro

Re: [Development] tools/configure with mingw build error

On 28/08/2012 12:16, ext Peter Kümmel wrote: > I've tried to build qtbase > 1. on Windows 7 > 2. rubenvb's mingw-w64: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/rubenvb/gcc-4.7-release/ > 3. in Windows shell cmd.exe > 4. as shadow build with

Re: [Development] Build Qt 5 with MinGW 4.7?

You can use the /cmd in your path instead. That way you have no extra msys tools in your path and the git.bat will add the required paths locally upon execution. So you get full git functionality without polluting you path. -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 8/26/12 16:23 ext Stephen Chu wrote: On 8/

Re: [Development] QMutex with pthread on Linux

On 8/22/12 7:58 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: >With adaptive locking: >RESULT : tst_QMutex::contendedQMutex():"no msleep, 2 mutexes": > 1,961,622.638 CPU ticks per iteration > 5561.854224 task-clock#3.781 CPUs utilized > >17,706,600,180 cycles

Re: [Development] Qt5 Beta: any news?

We still need to figure out how to handle the changes file(s). I think we do need one for each module, and then we simply aggregate that into the top-level Qt directory on release generation. Also, since we want to also be able to release modules independently, this would be required. Question

Re: [Development] How about the future of qbs after Nokia sells Qt to Digia?

On 11/08/2012 16:07, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: ... > It *looks* like Diego was actually asking about whether Qt intends to switch > to qbs as its own buildsystem. If that was the question, here's the answer: > > There has been NO decision I actually want to make it even more clear, there _H

Re: [Development] Changelog for 5.0 (Was: [Releasing] Content freeze for Qt 4.8.3 approaching)

On 10/08/2012 01:54, ext Kent Hansen wrote: > On that topic: How should we proceed in preparing the changes file > for 5.0? Should there _be_ a unified changes file for 5.0? (I noticed > that there's no changes-4.0.0 file; guessing that's because the leap > from Qt 3 to 4 was so huge (e.g., in term

Re: [Development] Two bugs in the QIcon which broke my life.

On 08/08/2012 04:12, ext André Somers wrote: > Op 8-8-2012 10:49, Stephen Kelly schreef: >> On Wednesday, August 08, 2012 10:35:15 André Somers wrote: >> > Op 8-8-2012 10:30, Stephen Kelly schreef: >> > > On Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:03:34 ? ??? wrote: >> > > > In the QIcon/QIconLoa

[Development] Gerrit changes older than 6 months and not yet merged

Hi all, I've done a query of all contributions older than 6 months, which have not yet been merged. It would be great if you could have a look to see which ones are obsolete and can be abandoned, and which ones are targeted the 5.1 release. If you have a WIP which is intented for 5.1, please st

Re: [Development] Cleanups for qt5.git

On 06/08/2012 03:47, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: ... > The first one is the fact that we have a few modules in there that > are basically unmaintained for a year and not really functional > anywhere. The document gallery is such an example and is the first > one I would like to remove (see > ht

Re: [Development] Proposal: adding Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT to many methods

On 03/08/2012 07:49, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2012 09.58.24, Konrad Rosenbaum > wrote: > > The problem with QDateTime is that the operator== also does some > calculations. It compares as equal two QDateTime objects with > different times and timezones, provided th

Re: [Development] Proposal: adding Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT to many methods

On 02/08/2012 14:25, ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: > On 02/08/2012 12:55, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.32.36, >> marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: >>> "the compiler can eliminate the mechanics of tracking the >>> lifetime of certain unwindable ob

Re: [Development] Proposal: adding Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT to many methods

On 02/08/2012 12:55, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.32.36, > marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: >> "the compiler can eliminate the mechanics of tracking the lifetime >> of certain unwindable objects in such a function, and significantly >> reduce the code size

Re: [Development] Proposal: adding Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT to many methods

On 02/08/2012 12:39, ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: > On 02/08/2012 12:32, ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: >> On 02/08/2012 12:19, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.15.26, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com >>> wrote: So, perhaps we can identify

Re: [Development] Proposal: adding Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT to many methods

On 02/08/2012 12:32, ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: > On 02/08/2012 12:19, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.15.26, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com >> wrote: >>> So, perhaps we can identify the cases where they are similar and use >>> that with MSVC until p

Re: [Development] Proposal: adding Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT to many methods

On 02/08/2012 12:19, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.15.26, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com > wrote: >> So, perhaps we can identify the cases where they are similar and use >> that with MSVC until proper noexcept()/noexcept() support is provided? > > Yes. I can ide

Re: [Development] Proposal: adding Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT to many methods

On 02/08/2012 07:50, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > The macro expands to nothing in C++98 mode. That means code using the > API so marked and compiling in C++98 mode will simply not gain the > benefits of the keyword, but should see no side effects. > > The presence of the keyword does not affect bin

Re: [Development] QFileSystemWatcher and Recursive Monitoring

On 25/07/2012 05:52, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 25 de julho de 2012 11.45.23, Laszlo Papp wrote: >>> Neither playground nor non-playground add-ons need to support >>> all platforms, though if they want to be in the Qt Essentials set >>> of modules, they do. >> >> Is that document

Re: [Development] QFileSystemWatcher and Recursive Monitoring

On 25/07/2012 00:29, ext Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:59 PM, > wrote: >> 4) put the functionality in an add-on, which has no requirement of >> supporting all platforms > > Really? Was a community decision agreed upon about that earlier? > Perhaps I have just missed something, b

Re: [Development] QFileSystemWatcher and Recursive Monitoring

4) put the functionality in an add-on, which has no requirement of supporting all platforms, and allow people who need it link to it. It can live its life there until a decent algorithm and API has been developed, and then we can bring it in if we want. -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 7/24/12 17:2

Re: [Development] Use static qt libraries

On 07/24/2012 05:08 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > It looks like your system has a major issue with dynamic linking if it takes > 10 seconds to load two or three libraries. Take QtGui's statistics (ok, on > Linux, but it's an indication): > > libQtCore.so.5: 3953 relocations, 3658 relative (92%),

Re: [Development] 回复： Re: Use static qt libraries

-Original Message- > From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm- > olsen=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Liu Song.7 (Nokia- > MP/Beijing) > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 6:06 PM > To: developme

Re: [Development] Use static qt libraries

No, I mean you should create a new .pro file which includes all the module libs you want to include, and then later in that file do the tweaks needed to generate the required result. Just compiling this new project will be enough to produce the end result. So, a new qt5-massive-library.pro whic

Re: [Development] Use static qt libraries

No, you will need to link it all at once, since an .so is considered a final product. You might be able to mess around with a qt5-massive-library.pro, which include()s all the module .pro files you want in the final library. It's unknown how much tweaking you will need to achieve this final all-

Re: [Development] Use static qt libraries

On 23/07/2012 08:56, ext song.7@nokia.com wrote: > Hi, > > To use the static qt libraries, now I can build out all the libQtCore.a > , libQtGui.a , libQtWidgets.a etc with option -static. > > Also I can create a new shared object libQtMaster.so which is composed > of all of above static objects

Re: [Development] Latest stable Qt5 code

We are pushing as hard as we can to make it happen asap, but with all the vacations happening in Europe right now I think it will happen in early August. -- .marius On 23/07/2012 08:41, Liu Song.7 (Nokia-MP/Beijing) wrote: > Thanks, but about when will we have a beta release ? > > -Origin

Re: [Development] Latest stable Qt5 code

On 23/07/2012 08:34, ext song.7@nokia.com wrote: > Hi, > > Can somebody point out how to get the latest stale Qt5 code ? The latest "stale" ;) Qt5 code should be what you get when you check out the master branch of qt5.git, as it and its submodules are only updated when the all the autotests

Re: [Development] Abandoning the container changes

On 18/07/2012 02:06, ext joao.abeca...@nokia.com wrote: > Hey, > > I would rather we don't *rush* the container changes in, but get them > up to snuff in a separate branch, instead. I would also like to > challenge the assumptions I've seen repeated that probability for > breakage is low and autote

Re: [Development] Suggestion on QML portability

On 17/07/2012 06:02, ext Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: >> 2012/7/17 Sven Anderson > 07:47, Alan Alpert wrote: >>> But our Qt4Support library exists and is called QtQuick1. All >>> the old symbols should be there, if you want to take the easy >>> road to saying "done, ported to Qt 5!". >> Well, ther

Re: [Development] Contributing to the Qt Project behind a hefty firewall and proxy server

On 13/07/2012 10:04, ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: > So, I think we'll go ahead and get a port forward setup. It has been done. You can now point your git to git clone ssh://@ssh.qt-project.org:443/qt/qt5 instead, if needed. -- .marius ___

Re: [Development] Experimental Qt 5 installers by Digia

uot; prefix, and you should be using the CDN, and download the packages much much faster. We are not quite sure why this redirect is happening. -- .marius From: releasing-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia@qt-project.org [mailto:releasing-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia@qt-project.

Re: [Development] Contributing to the Qt Project behind a hefty firewall and proxy server

Ok, you guys just misunderstand each other. Thiago says we should do it, to ensure that the Qt Project is accessible behind badly configured corporate firewalls. He also says that you should at the same time have a discussion with Corporate Security to make them understand that the current situ

Re: [Development] Contributing to the Qt Project behind a hefty firewall and proxy server

On 13/07/2012 06:42, ext Laszlo Papp wrote: > There are certain situations out there, when it is currently not so > simple to contribute to the Qt Project. One typical use case, if > there is a proxy server without using socks, just plain http. In > those cases, ssh tunneling does not work either p

Re: [Development] Migrating widgets out of qtbase into their own repo

No, there are no plans for that. At least not any immediate plans to my knowledge. -- .marius > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm- > olsen=nokia@qt-project.org] On B

Re: [Development] Nominating Ritt Konstantin as approver

On 02/07/2012 16:45, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo > wrote: >> On 26 June 2012 18:21, Konstantin Ritt wrote: >>> Any progress?) >>> >>> Konstantin >> >> Only another couple of days :-) >> >> You have been nominated on 7 of June, so you must w

Re: [Development] buildsystem branches (about to be) integrated

On 01/07/2012 13:26, ext k blammo wrote: > On 01/07/2012 15:44, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> >> The perl that comes with msysgit doesn't work with our syncqt script. > > Is this a regression with respect to > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,27136 > or is it a different issue? Seems likely.

Re: [Development] Policy for creating new mailing lists

On 30/06/2012 09:53, ext Laszlo Papp wrote: > What is the policy for creating mailing lists? I have just realized > this mailing list after a little bit of talk over here at aKademy: > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-components > > I had the impression previously, those requests sho

Re: [Development] QtCS: OpenGL session notes

On 28/06/2012 01:59, ext Samuel Rødal wrote: > On 06/27/2012 06:30 PM, ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: >> On 25/06/2012 13:44, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: >>> Future plans - Desktop OpenGL 3+ support, ES 3 support >> >> We've just added ANGLE support in Qt (-angle ), to enable >> DirectX

Re: [Development] Notes from the QWidget session

On 27/06/2012 12:55, ext Thorbjørn Martsum wrote: > Btw. Is somebody looking into the regressions in QGraphicsView? Nope, QGV is currently lacking a maintainer. Anyone with qualifications and feeling the urge? :) -- .marius ___ Development mailing list

Re: [Development] QtCS: OpenGL session notes

On 27/06/2012 12:14, ext Sean Harmer wrote: > On Wednesday 27 June 2012 16:30:50 marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com > wrote: >> On 25/06/2012 13:44, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: >>> Future plans - Desktop OpenGL 3+ support, ES 3 support >> >> We've just added ANGLE support in Qt (-angle ), to enable >>

Re: [Development] QtCS: OpenGL session notes

On 25/06/2012 13:44, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > Future plans > - Desktop OpenGL 3+ support, ES 3 support We've just added ANGLE support in Qt (-angle ), to enable DirectX usage instead of OpenGL ES 2 on Windows, due to many buggy drivers. How will this effort affect this usage? Will we ac

Re: [Development] Code of conduct.

Right. I must admit i can't see which specific incident which triggered this thread now, i believe the community has behaved good lately. But i agree that a general code of conduct for all our forums (mails, IRC, reviews, bugreports, etc) So, let's grab one of the existing CoC for KDE, Linux.Co

[Development] Release Testing Form: http://testresults.qt-project.org/forms/release-testing/

Hi, I have created an online form (http://testresults.qt-project.org/forms/release-testing/) based on the list I sent previously (http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/releasing/2012-May/000275.html). The form will send an email with the form data directly to the releas...@qt-project.org mailing

Re: [Development] FW: Alpha 2 this week or skip it

It's not wrong and it doesn't really matter. Once MSVC starts to differ from the VC version, in the sense that they are not connected, then we can discuss changing them. For now, let's not make Qt 5 more incompatible with Qt 4. It's not worth it, just to be pedantic. :-) -- Sent from my Nokia

Re: [Development] On QML, ownership, QObject-trees and QSharedPointer

W00t should have a backlog which covers the conversation, if it was done on our public channels :-) -- Sent from my Nokia N9On 5/23/12 13:44 ext Thiago Macieira wrote: On quarta-feira, 23 de maio de 2012 14.16.12, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > On 05/23/2012 01:25 PM, Rene Jensen wrote: > > Question:

Re: [Development] qtphonon's status.

On 5/18/12 12:02 PM, "ext Stephen Kelly" mailto:stephen.ke...@kdab.com>> wrote: On Friday, May 18, 2012 08:41:13 marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: > We did promise a minimal migration path from Qt 4 to Qt 5, and removing > the phonon module from qt5.git,

Re: [Development] Build failed use MinGW-TDM or MinGW-w64 on Windows

Just try to do %QTSOURCE%\configure -opensource -prefix D:/qpSOFT/Projects/BuildQt5-x86-tdm/qtbase -confirm-license -platform win32-g++ -debug-and-release -fast -nomake examples >>config.log 2>&1 Instead, and see if that helps. -- .marius On 5/18/12 11:37 AM, "ext Loaden" mailto:loa...@gma

Re: [Development] qtphonon's status.

On 5/18/12 10:14 AM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On sexta-feira, 18 de maio de 2012 05.54.10, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com >wrote: >> This probably means we should keep the old repo there for backwards >> compatibility, and with documentation stating that the module is old and >> out-of-date, a

Re: [Development] The place of QML

On 5/18/12 8:22 AM, "ext Uwe Rathmann" wrote: >I would be careful with terms like "outdated". In the end the desktop is >the concept of the 90s ( widget are much older ) and the current >desktops are the part that doesn't work on smartphones alike devices. >But are keyboard and mouse outdated - on

Re: [Development] The place of QML

Sounds like marketing? It might be a 'constant' in the grand scheme of big-O notations. However, if the result is that you can only get 24 fps on low-end HW with large power footprint vs. 60 fps with HW acceleration, lower power footprint and leaving the main CPU to do more important tasks, what w

Re: [Development] Build failed use MinGW-TDM or MinGW-w64 on Windows

Based on the output below, I think there might be a path invariance between prefix and QTDIR, if you have that set. So, make sure that $$QTDIR is the same as $$[QT_HOST_PREFIX]. If you have QTDIR set, then qmake will pass '-qtdir ' to syncqt on invocation. Check that against what 'qmake –query

Re: [Development] qtphonon's status.

This probably means we should keep the old repo there for backwards compatibility, and with documentation stating that the module is old and out-of-date, and where and how they can get a more recent version. We shouldn't mix build systems in qt5.git itself. If other add-ons decide to use cmake as

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

It has always supported it. It's just not used that much. -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 5/11/12 3:50 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: AFAIK, Installing with INSTALL_ROOT is known not to work with Qt5's "modular" projects. BTW, does windows even support make install? Has it started supported it these

[Development] RFC: Test Reports for source/binary packages

Hi, Back in the days, when we were approaching a new release of Qt, we would use a black team which would be responsible for driving the testing of a new package. Their main focus would be to test every new package generated, both source and binar

Re: [Development] [CI] reverse dependency testing

will happen. -- .marius > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm- > olsen=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Mcgovern Rohan (Nokia- > MP/Brisbane) > Sent: Tuesday, May 01,

Re: [Development] [Poll] Which direction should Qt Quick 2.x development take?

/wiki -- .marius > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm- > olsen=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Alpert Alan (Nokia- > MP/Brisbane) > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 9:02

[Development] Convenient script for contributors: git gpush

Hi, I've just pushed a convenience script to the qtrepotools repository, which makes it easier to push patch-sets with reviewers added. If you ensure that you have /qtrepotools/bin in your path, you can simply do git gpush + + = = This pushes HEAD to the remote 'gerrit' to the remote bran

Re: [Development] The place of QML

That's a strongly biased poll due to the wording. And it's missing the points the Lars has been trying convey, but some seem to ignore. -- Sent from my Nokia N9On 4/20/12 17:31 ext d3fault wrote: *cough* http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/16465/ Does Qt need a modern C++ GUI API? -No, I a

Re: [Development] Suggested improvements to JIRA

On 20/04/2012 08:21, ext Sergio Ahumada wrote: > On 04/20/2012 03:12 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: >> Additionally, I'd like to request a review that every approver in the Qt >> Project has an account and that it is correctly in the OGApprovers group. >> While cleaning up my tasks, I noticed two a

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

Now wait a minute, I never said such a thing. I said that the MinGW-w64 binaries are Cygwin-based now. Meaning, the MinGW they release needs Cygwin DLLs to run. The output they generate is still native Win32 binaries, which does _not_ require Cygwin. (Anything else would be silly, since you cou

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

Take another look. They haven't produced pure MinGW binary releases since the end of 2011. The front page says "The mingw-w64 toolchain has been officially added to Cygwin mirrors", and when you look under the "Releases" (and then under "Automated Builds") section to the left on the front page,

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

On 19/04/2012 17:06, ext 1+1=2 wrote: >> From the homepage of project, http://mingwbuilds.sourceforge.net/ > >This is the MinGW-builds project ("mingwbuilds") >This project was registered on SourceForge.net on Mar 30, 2012, and > is described by the project team as follows: >Snapshots a

Re: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt/Qt Creator/Qt SDK

If you click the link in Daniels initial email, and onto the windows host directory, you would see that the have both the 4.7.0 release and the 4.7.1 prerelease as binaries already. -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 4/19/12 16:14 ext Mark wrote: 2012/4/19 Hi Everyone, After several complains from

Re: [Development] The place of QML

On 19/04/2012 09:49, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:25 PM, André Somers wrote: >> Op 19-4-2012 8:18, Robin Burchell schreef: >>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan >>> wrote: As for a blog, why is there no qt-project blog? It would be great t

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

ike some others, I would prefer it to remain in non-private headers, while mark the QPA API with non-BC promise. IMO, in Qt 5.1 we should be able to promise BC on the QPA APIs too. -- .marius From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+mar

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

> -Original Message- > From: ext Girish Ramakrishnan [mailto:gir...@forwardbias.in] > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:03 AM, wrote: > > On 17/04/2012 03:34, ext Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > >> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:57:16 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > >>> As per the previous discuss, I rena

Re: [Development] Browsing the Qt Playground project repositories online

Meaning you can now find the playground projects here: http://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground :) -- .marius On 17/04/2012 05:00, ext Laszlo Papp wrote: > FTR: No mentionings, but Ossi has already fixed this issue.:-) Thanks for > that! > > Best Regards, > Laszlo Papp > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

On 17/04/2012 03:34, ext Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:57:16 ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: >> As per the previous discuss, I renamed all the _qpa.h to _p.h with >> a couple of helper scripts > > I just added the following "-1" comment on gerrit: > > I do not agree with this

Re: [Development] Resolving the wiki situtation

On 13/04/2012 11:03, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:57 AM, > wrote: >> On 13/04/2012 08:50, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:56 AM, >>> wrote: Will the old pages redirect to the new one or will the >>> domain wiki.qt-project.org completely die

Re: [Development] Resolving the wiki situtation

On 13/04/2012 08:50, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:56 AM, wrote: >> Starting from Thursday next week, we will copy the pages that >> currently live on wiki.qt-project.org over to qt-project.org/wiki, >> below the "Developing Qt" category. It's not the perfect way of >>

Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta

On 13/04/2012 09:41, ext jason.mcdon...@nokia.com wrote: >> Random question of the day: do you happen to have stats about how >> often those insignificant tests actually fail? That should help to >> figure out which ones are actually working, and therefore should >> not be marked as insignificant.

Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!

th) a worldwide license to use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works (...), communicate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute such content." -- .marius > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=no

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0 alpha released

rius From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Storm-Olsen Marius (Nokia-MP/Austin) Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 10:01 AM To: annou...@qt-project.org Cc: development@qt-project.org; re

Re: [Development] alpha build error Windows Seven

Common reason for this issue is unclean environment variables. So, make sure that PATH, INCLUDES, LIBS and QTDIR does not point to old version of Qt, SDKs or previous builds. And if you *do* set QTDIR, it needs to point to /qtbase. -- .marius On 04/09/2012 04:38 PM, ext qtnext wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [Development] Build qwebkit module failed if use '--v8' option

All I can say is that we know WebKit is not yet building on Windows, and it might take some time before we get there. Right now there's virtually no resources available for handling QtWebKit on Windows, unless someone feels it's time they learn some webkit buildsystem stuff for Windows :) -- .

Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!

IMO that's reasonable. They are an equal part of the Qt community as anybody else, since it benefits Qt directly. -- .marius On 04/06/2012 08:01 AM, ext simon.hausm...@nokia.com wrote: > I think it would be great if we could extend the invitations to WebKit > committers that are contributors t

Re: [Development] Fatal error occurred when building Qt5 Alpha on Win7(x64)

Are you sure your environment is clean, that you have no paths (in PATH, LIBS, INCLUDES) which points to previous/older builds of Qt? Qt5 repo, Qt4, SDKs etc? Which perl are you using? ActiveState, MinGW, Cygwin, Strawberry? If it's Cygwin, it's likely that it's not munging something in syncqt

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.0 alpha released

On 04/05/2012 09:54 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 5 de abril de 2012 11.49.40, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> and just for good measure, let simo repeat "i will not bypass CI >>> again" about a thousand times. >> >> Why? It sounds like this is exactly the proper releasing procedure.

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.0 alpha released

On 04/05/2012 09:38 AM, ext Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:54:56AM -0300, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On quinta-feira, 5 de abril de 2012 13.49.40, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com >> wrote: >>> Those were local in Simo's machine due to some cherry-picking of not yet >>> lande

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.0 alpha released

Those were local in Simo's machine due to some cherry-picking of not yet landed changed. I wanted to tag with reviewed an landed changes though -- Sent from my Nokia N9On 4/5/12 8:34 ext Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 5 de abril de 2012 03.10.10, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: > I

Re: [Development] Compiling failed on Mac OS Lion 64 with Xcode 4.3.2

On 04/04/2012 11:30 PM, ext hailong geng wrote: > with this : > /./configure -opensource -confirm-license -nomake tests -openssl -I > /usr/include/openssl/ -L /usr/lib// > /perl build/ You forgot the -prefix $PWD/qtbase option. (See http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5-Alpha-building-instructions)

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.0 alpha released

I will create the tags as soon as all the needed patches have landed. -- Sent from my Nokia N9On 4/4/12 17:39 Mcgovern Rohan (Nokia-MP/Brisbane) wrote: simo.f...@nokia.com said: > Moi, > I can't provide you an easy way but I can show you a way to get the alpha > out of git (see below). But yes, it

Re: [Development] Compiling Qt5 Alpha on Linux fails

The original intention was to support installed libs. However after quite done testing (after having created the script) we decided that the alpha couldn't support it. Now we will support it in the beta, so there was no point in removing it. And as it solves a problem exposed by Jom with top-l

Re: [Development] Compiling Qt5 Alpha on Linux fails

arius > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm- > olsen=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of ext Peter Rullmann > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 4:29 AM > To: Qt Development List

Re: [Development] Compiling Qt5 Alpha on Windows XP not working

esn't like. Try unsetting your CL environment variable before executing the build script. -- .marius > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm- > olsen=nokia@qt-project.o

[Development] Qt 5.0 alpha released

Hi, We are happy to announce the Qt 5.0 alpha release. This is the first major Qt release since the Qt Project went live, and a large amount of work and features have gone into this release. Blog post: http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2012/04/03/qt-5-alpha/ Download page: http://qt-project.org/wik

Re: [Development] Maintainer "TrustMes"

On 02/04/2012 08:22, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > One of the duties of a maintainer is to ensure that every > contribution to the code he/she maintains is being reviewed. That is, > if no one else approves or rejects, the maintainer has the duty to > make that happen. I've done this in the past and

Re: [Development] V8 on iOS

On 02/04/2012 08:06, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 2 de abril de 2012 13.02.08, > aaron.kenn...@nokia.com wrote: >> On 02/04/2012, at 2:21 PM, ext Ian wrote: >>> Chris, Thanks for your answer. So, the low-down is that it's not >>> (practically) possible to use QML without V8, and e

Re: [Development] Nominating Giuseppe D'Angelo (peppe) for approver status

+1, and first! -- .marius > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm- > olsen=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of ext Robin Burchell > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 7:30 AM &g

Re: [Development] New QUrl reviewing

Eh, after alpha please? -- .marius > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm- > olsen=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP/Oslo) > Sent: Thursday, Marc

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 4.8.1 release during week 11/2012

On 3/20/12 11:56 AM, "ext Turunen Tuukka" wrote: > >On 20.3.2012 11.11, "marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com" > wrote: > >>Please don't create the tags yet though. I've heard that there are a >>couple of things that needs to be fixed first, though I have not received >>an email on the issues yet. > > >I

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 4.8.1 release during week 11/2012

Please don't create the tags yet though. I've heard that there are a couple of things that needs to be fixed first, though I have not received an email on the issues yet. -- .marius On 3/20/12 9:20 AM, "ext Sergio Ahumada" wrote: >On 03/20/2012 09:08 AM, ext Turunen Tuukka wrote: >> >> Hi Giri

  1   2   >