Windows replicates a bit of the Unix hierarchy in its
installation folder. But it only exposes a small subset to the Windows
command line through the .../bin or .../cmd folders.
Konrad
OpenPGP_0xBE96A6EE776FE5D0.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Hi,
Oh, yes, that works too.
I originally just used the first working URL I could infer from the web
page. It would be really super if cgit could show a proper clone URL.
Konrad
On 27/03/2023 15:31, Jukka Jokiniva via Development wrote:
Hi,
Should the repository url be without the
'https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qt3d.git/' not found
error: could not fetch origin
Konrad
OpenPGP_0xBE96A6EE776FE5D0.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-p
on of that day. My guess would be that someone did maintenance or
installed a new version and some minor mayhem was overseen...
Question to the admins: will you fix the cgit URLs or does everybody
else need to fix their links?
Konrad
OpenPGP_0xBE96A6EE776FE5D0.asc
Description: OpenPGP p
y
own experience: to have an audit performed on your code can be a pain in
the behind, but it is worth it - the code is significantly improved.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
that tool - otherwise other users are able
to attack by inserting malicious code
I have the bad feeling that someone should perform a security audit on
MaintenanceTool and installer framework.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sign
than remembering a
dozen layers of layouts and widgets that simply serve some
layouting-purpose.
Konrad
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
ll skip
"choice" as well and use whatever Debian is providing (most of the time
I feel like this about GCC, various databases, Apache, etc.).
It is a question of convenience and the amount of "giving a damn"...
Konrad
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
ll be so irresponsible of not notifying
security patches, and I'm certain we will work around this issue,
to maybe distributed in a better way for Open Source users.
How about keeping those branches public and just not providing binary
packages?
Konrad
_
r a good reason. The only way to
do this with this proposal is to make count() deprecated from the start!
So, why bother with duplicated API in the first place?
Konrad
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-
ebEngine or
Technical Writing - make a choice. Chose wisely! ;)
Konrad
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Hi,
On 6/25/19 9:59 PM, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
> On 25 Jun 2019, at 21:30, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
>> Pardon my lingo,
> You should be able to communicate your points without that kind of lingo. Try
> better.
>
>> It is documentation for developers for crying out loud! I
Hi,
...my 2 cents or so...
On 6/25/19 4:30 PM, Palaraja, Kavindra wrote:
> No, parity isn't Google's search box. There's already a search feature in
> Creator.
>
> No, not "The Qt Company is hiring" either.
>
> The idea is to have parity in the sense of 1:1 appearance of how the
> documentation
nemies: so the platform issues(*) will be
solved till Qt 6.0?
So, even if I try to compile Qt myself on, say MinGW or 32bit MacOS - I
will end up with a (fully?) functional Assistant?
(*)https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtwebengine-platform-notes.html
Konrad
pEpkey.asc
Description: applic
h its specialized search.
Konrad
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
to compile my own GCC and X11
libraries because no supported version of Qt would compile with the one(s)
in the target OS.
Konrad
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On Mon, October 2, 2017 11:54, René J. V. Bertin wrote:
> Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
>> Whenever a QueuedConnection triggers the sending object generates an
>> event
>> and delivers it to the event queue of the thread that owns the target
>> slot's
>
> So the s
Hi,
On Saturday 30 September 2017 16:24:57 René J. V. Bertin wrote:
> Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> > Apart from this I'd suspect you will still get the SEGV if you do not
> > block - even if the frequency changes.
>
> As in when emitting the signal too frequently from mu
the SEGV if you do not block
- even if the frequency changes. This points to you using some kind of
pointer that is not properly controlled (e.g. sending a signal to a QFSW
that is already deleted).
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
problem with a Mutex: you ensured
that the instance was only used by one instance at a time.
Another way is to explicitly use Qt::QueuedConnection to feed the QFSW or
to untangle your code to ensure each QSFW is only visible from one thread.
Konrad
uot; :-(
(*) or is this Alfabet now - I can never remember this one
In short: even completely phonetic languages with reforms that make the
language even more logical and phonetic provide ample opportunity to screw
up the spelling of several generations while also providing for futile,
but h
of mayhem. It is a nightmare if you have
to diagnose problems.
In short: the recommendation in the C# world is: "do not use them unless you
absolutely positively have no other choice." We should take that as a warning.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a
ontinue working with Qt 6, then I will not get a budget for
that.
The community will pay for my laziness by having to support an outdated
framework for much longer. Lazy people are great at externalizing... :-P
Konrad
___
Development mailing lis
e for a type stored in
QVariant makes a lot of magic possible that would otherwise require major
blobs of glue code or it would otherwise simply be so inconvenient to use
that it wouldn't be worth bothering.
Konrad
___
Development mailing li
ints from people living what is jokingly called
"real life". ;-)
Do NOT expect modern connected systems at the user's side!
Konrad
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
all!
In fact quite a few of my colleagues will not recognize 2001:db8::42 as a
valid IP address...
In short: IPv4 (including multicast, which is used for "message buses")
has to work well for the foreseeable future. Even on an OS that we both
would not recommend for p
rs, nor does it wrap all functionality
of zlib. So at the very least qt-zlib needs to be linked in a way that allows
an additional version of zlib to be linked.
Konrad
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists
ograms for platforms that do not run on your host
(anything that is cross-compiled, or if the binary loader is missing or
broken)
* it is unsafe (although we'll assume that you will not compile and deploy
a program that sabotages your own System)
Konrad
___
Hi,
On Monday 18 July 2016 07:59:21 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
> On Saturday 16 of July 2016 13:56:00 Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> > I am currently interfacing two libraries that only have QVariant in
> > common, most of the (value) types getting exchanged are either Qt
> > co
out that I
can use QVariant::data() to get at the void* that I need to access
properties and Q_INVOKABLEs.
Is there a particular reason that QVariant::data() is classified as
\internal or would a documentation patch be accepted?
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
ctor (allocation hell) nor QLinkedList (slow retrieval
with large data sets) are serious alternatives.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-pr
od luck.
It might be this oddity of my language, but I really hate this whole
"onSomething" style - it reeks of hungarian notation and seems completely
superfluous.
Either way, since I don't care much about QML/JS - do whatever you like
there.
uous in relation to a URL to justify an
automatic conversion.
Konrad
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
ports, less and programmers will constantly bitch about it.
BTW: you can already implicitly cast QByteArray->QString, so why not allow
it through QVariant?
Konrad
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
ackend (from app code) what features it supports and
whether it even was able to find its libraries or OS features.
> * SSL Client
>
> A backend offering this capability must offer the basic client-side
> QSslSocket API.
Including a very basic version of QSslError please! (Error
the batch file right now, syntax may be off
slightly.
Konrad
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
the batch file right now, syntax may be off
slightly.
Konrad
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
ll no!
> > Anyone up for creating a nice function for Qt 5.4?
Ping me when the reviews are due. I'm very interested in it, but lack time for
programming it.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
that it
offers at least a bit of resistance against attack.
> std::rand() function. For more information about the importance of good
> masking,
> see \l {http://w2spconf.com/2011/papers/websocket.pdf}.
> The best measure against attacks mentioned in the document above,
>
es) sufficient
freedom to implement those requirements.
Incidentally it gives you an excuse to cop out of security discussions... ;-)
> Should I fall back to the ordinary qrand() when the other methods fail?
Yes.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a
ow and I would not waste too much effort on this for the
initial release. It might even be argued that the effort should be shifted to
apps that actually need secure random by implementing a weak virtual function
and allowing the user to override it.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description
l[tm] while the boss insists
that he would run into export restrictions if he allowed OpenSSL).
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
ufficed. On the part of the paper (link below) I guess it is
typical of cryptographers to use cryptographic tools to the exclusion of
simpler tools, on the part of the RFC authors ... I don't know...?
On Monday, Monday 27 January 2014 at 11:12, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> On Sunday, Sunday 2
vironment where data is specially crafted to fit
the test purpose, where tests are designed from the beginning of the project,
and where engineers know what they are doing. Often enough none of those is
true in reality.
Konrad
signatur
queued until the handshake is complete and only
transmitted after a successful handshake
In that case we do not need to worry about "secure masking". If not, we may
have to rethink the design and/or strong random (if we also care about
corporations using outdated and broken proxies)...
Hi,
[wow, I had a good laugh!]
On Sunday 26 January 2014, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2014, at 11:31, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> > Depends. What is it used for? Is it just obfuscation or is it supposed
> > to be real security?
>
> Well, there are 2 places where random
n most operating
systems and inadequate on all the others. Don't use them for security.
I would not recommend trying to implement your own PRNG either - getting it
right is horribly difficult. Getting the entropy gathering right in a cross-
platform way is much worse effort...
I wonder whether
fferent matter: call me an old-grumpy-Mosaic-user if you
like, but I usually add a body of the "if you are not redirected
automatically click here" -type when I program redirects, I usually even
include a meta tag - you never know how stupid the configuration on the
server is where your s
et bar: Label{ text: "hello" }
Label { text: "world" }
}
}
The "world" label shows up, while the "hello" widget is ignored by the layout
(the outer Widget is necessary because layouts cannot be shown on their own)
atches appear to be cherry-picks anyway.
I'm not sure whether any CC license is compatible enough. You'd have to ask a
lawyer. (Ooops.)
Even though the license of the text on a site says absolutely nothing about
the code hosted on that si
help, but it gives you a nice fuzzy feeling of being ahead one step... ;-)
(IANAL)
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
The layouts' addWidget methods reparent to their parent
> widget.
>
> Therefore one option might be to just not call set parent on widget
> objects and let the list property code deal with reparenting.
Yepp. That's it.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description:
Hi,
On Saturday 02 November 2013, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Thursday, 2013-10-31, 20:17:43, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> > I've got it running
> > for trivial QML files, however as soon as there are child widgets the
> > running program aborts.
> >
> > The
ut of ideas on how to solve this. Should I consider
setParent, qqmlvme or the direct use of QWidgets as a bug?
Konrad
[1] It enables you to create widget based GUIs using QML.
git://github.com/KDAB/DeclarativeWidgets
[2] In 5.2 beta this is line 627 in qqmlvme.cpp. It's Hallow
development shops really need to read those books, whether-or-not they use
> Qt (a shame these books don't exist at present.)
How about reviving "Qt Quarterly"?
I would be willing to donate a few articles to it, if others are willing to
ke
an empty string "" or the root directory "/"? The former may
indicate a bug on Apple's part, the latter is a perfectly valid place to be
in.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
bligations under (L)GPL and making sure users have what they need.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
C++ files and you are
limited to a small share of an already underperforming machine.)
In other words: broken source compatibility. Period.
Whenever that happens a certain Teutonic programmer forgets that little
invention called "civilization", grabs his battle hammer and screams blo
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 August 2013 17:10:31 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 6 de agosto de 2013 15:41:21, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 August 2013 18:51:10 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On domingo, 4 de agosto de 2013 10:20:51, Dmitry Ashkadov wrote:
> > >
NPATH behavior takes precedence over RPATH if the system
understands it (according to man ld).
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt
would be that you won't see an
appreciable drop in traffic, but torrents would help users with bad or slow
connections.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Develop
f mock-Unix. ;-)
The CI machines would simply have to have these virtual loops installed and
they'd need some kind of configuration that shows which ports to use (Linux
/dev/pts/*, Windows: COM?).
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
rators and
looks almost completely native on Windows (I use it for exactly those reasons
in one of my applications).
If I just wanted to change colors, I'd use a style sheet.
> I expect it to have some more visual tweaks, but unless there are loud
> protests, I would like to h
; function too (effectively an operator===), allowing you to easily check
> if two dates refer to the same time in the same TZ?
It might be a good idea. But don't rush it - there is time for this in Qt5.1.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: T
On Thursday 02 August 2012 23:01:55 you wrote:
> On Thursday August 2 2012, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 August 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.55.54, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> > > > Where is qHash(QDateTime)
On Thursday 02 August 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.55.54, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> > Where is qHash(QDateTime) defined? It doesn't seem to be where I
> > expected it (qhash.* or qdatetime.*).
>
> qdatetime.{h,cpp}
Ok, found
need to retrieve it from a file, or worse to calculate it from a
POSIX-style rule (and then cache it for later). When converting to another
zone things get worse.
Depending on the implementation that will end up in Qt the actual lookup for
which time zone is being used may have side effects to
On Wednesday 15 February 2012, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 15, 2012 21:55:54 Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> > The
> >
> > calculation results are almost identical. Almost.
>
> Is that enough?
>
> John Layt mentioned the existence of such a ma
I think it would need somewhat more
> involved discussion.
Windows names can be mapped to Olson names - there are lists on the web. The
calculation results are almost identical. Almost.
A parser for Olson DB files is not overly complex to write - I did that within
a weekend.
git://silmor.de/k
69 matches
Mail list logo
